Is UVA Hospital Above the Law? C’ville and Albemarle Commonwealth’s Attorneys’ Offices and UVA Police Seem to Think So

Ever tried to report a crime committed against you at UVA? Well good luck to you.  The Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney office may tell you you have to figure out whether the crime was committed in Albemarle or Charlottesville and won’t answer your reasonable question of whether it was a federal or local crime, attorney supposedly consulted too busy to look it up?  Albemarle is more polite but still insists on you calling UVA police.  UVA police are downright rude and derisive and insist you must be “on grounds” to report a UVA crime when there office is off grounds on Ivy Road.  Also insist you bring all the evidence and prove intent just to report a crime.  Gee, and I thought police were supposed to investigate crimes, not ask victims to present complete and proven cases, silly me.  I have found no way to report a crime against me at UVA and everyone suggests I get a lawyer? To report a crime.  I guess the next step is to walk into both Charlottesville and Albemarle (where is it) Police Departments and insist one of them take my report of a crime, talk to a REAL policeman, not a company man playing policeman at UVA.  And folks wonder why crime is low as reported at UVA, maybe because it isn’t investigated and people give up on reporting it after being sent through circles by C’ville, Albemarle and UVA? Anyone still willing to say this isn’t a company town and the company is the University of Virginia? 

I have had a crime against me go uninvestigated 17 years ago, I’m not giving up, but most people will. And they will suffer the sense of not being an equal citizen, because if you can’t report a crime against you and have it investigated, what are you? A citizen or a member of the underclass?  Let’s not forget our history in Charlottesville and the United States in general as it continues today as crimes against people of color, people and even children with disabilities, transgender folks, etc., are not investigated, prosecuted nor sentenced in proportion to crimes against middle class and upper class whites.  That is not a democracy.

Blogging UVA 5 East Psych. Unit So You Can’t Sleep and I Can (#1 of a Series)

So I found out that my long term Ph.D., Licensed, former adjunct professor at UVA retired, was in the room when Dr. Lady Martinez, an unlicensed psychiatric resident with no training in urology, came into my bedroom on UVA 5 East, contrary to what I was told at the informal human rights resolution meeting with Licensing present, and said she was going to do a second catheterization.  She ignored me when I said I had emptied my bladder so there was no reason for the traumatic procedure by an untrained resident (although all I said was I had gone to the bathroom).  My older licensed clinical psychologist, old enough to be Dr. Lady Martinez’s grandmother, told her she had been in the room and heard me go.  Dr. unlicensed, inexperienced and arrogant and lacking in humility and proper respect Martinez ignored her and would have catheterized me in front of my long term psychologist, compromising a fruitful therapeutic relationship and leaving me with nothing to survive UVA 5 East with if I had not asked that she wait until my psychologist left.  Dr. untrained, unhumble, inexperienced, young, first or second or third year resident did not meet the standard of care for a psychiatry resident and had no supervision from her attending, Dr. Bashir to teach her respect for her patients and her elders.  It is only luck that I have not lost the most important and life saving therapeutic relationship in my life due to Dr. Lady Martinez’s hubris and lack  of training and supervision.  I hope she sleeps as well as me for a very long time.  I still could end up on Flomax due to these rough catheterizations, my pleas for a referral to a urologist were ignored as were my pleas for a transfer to another team with more respect and less brutality.

A male patient admitted late in my stay played with himself in front of a young female patient.  Her report to the staff was ignored as was his attempt to find out who reported him.  I can only pray she wasn’t traumatized more.  I saw him play with himself myself but I’m older and less impressed or hurt by sociopathic men.  Staff failed in their primary responsibility, same as they did ten years ago when 3 patients were raped in that unit by a male staff after the first to report him was ignored.  The “progressive community’s” response and SAARA’s response? The progressives held a rally about the firing of felons with a token speaker from the VDVSA but SAARA refused to participate or even speak up until a letter months letter actually defending UVA from a former director.  Think things are better at SAARA today? Think again and read an earlier post.

The second TV room was turned into an office and 6 rooms were turned over to pay drug addicts and alcoholics to do research on addiction so 5 East is very small now and only has one TV in the dining room/day room.  There is no staff overview of what  is on it and one person is allowed to dominate the television all day long with violent m0vies triggering patients if he so chooses.  Complaints are unheard especially from women.

UVA is counting AC as “fresh air”.  No comment.  They have a cage to let people out into that they only sometimes use. It is a cage, go look at it.

UVA 5 East mixes men and women together in all common rooms with no staff supervision.  Women and men can be harassed and bothered by the opposite sex with no interference from staff. 

UVA takes away everything a person has with them and doesn’t tell people they can ask to look at some of their stuff, in fact they never told me my address book had been dropped off and took  my cell phone and left it on so the battery died.  If I hadn’t memorized some numbers I would have had no way to reach anyone on one of their two non private phones where everyone else including staff and patients can hear you speak and the noise is often overwhelming.  My human rights booklet was taken from  me and not returned. I have never heard of a psychiatric unit that just kidnapped all of patients’ belongings rather than sorting them and returning safe items. UVA 5 East is “special” in its complete disregard for the personal belongings and rights of its patients.

UVA 5 East has no one for patients to talk to when they are upset and no place for them to go away from other patients. Many if not most patients are in double rooms.  There are no comfort rooms, there are no times assigned for nurses or even trained psychiatric technicians, (UVA doesn’t hire licensed psychiatric technicians, only PCA’s, guess psychiatric technicians are too good for their patients), to talk to their patients or ask them if they want to talk. Staff stay behind a glass wall with no opening unless they are out ordering patients around.  Or unless they are the part time male occupational therapist or the few nurses who acted like they cared about doing a good job.

When food arrives late for meals there is no apology.  Late in my stay staff started taking all the favorite breakfast cereals for themselves.

UVA 5 East psychiatrists teach dis-empowerment and non-citizenship and every anti-recovery principle out there. More on that in another post but suffice it to say I am still having problems believing I am a citizen after my stay there and in many ways I am not since I can’t even report a crime and get respect. 

Do not take anyone you love to UVA 5 East unless they will  not go anywhere else or the alternative is worse like possible rape or assault on the street or you can’t possibly drive them to another state.   They will not thank you later, they may thank you when you leave out of relief, but the rest of their lives will be scarred by their stay there and if you are the one who put them there, your relationship may never heal.  If you did not put them there but defend them, again you may ruin your relationship. 

More tomorrow night, I really hope psychiatric residents and attendings and NAMI members and board members and TAC folks past and present who have met me and members of the closed and secretive Commission on Mental Health Law Reform with its closed and secret committees are reading and enjoying these updates and sleep really well in their expensive hotel in Williamsburg………..

Here Are Some of My Flashbacks: For Doctors and Delegates and Professors to Dream About Like I Do

I just thought about the resident who not only pulled out my PIC line so hard it left a fistula that caused severe pain that was ignored by UVA dialysis for months years later because he didn’t want to be the doctor to a “mental case” who also told my mother I must be sneaking lithium on the side because of course everyone wants to throw up all day every day and be tied to a PIC line for hydration on their 40th birthday….. Same resident, taught by UVA medical faculty, theorized I had late developed bulimia despite 7+ weeks in the hospital and acute kidney failure I now know.  Or it was lithium toxicity, who knows, UVA doesn’t keep medical records very well.  And they certainly don’t dialysize wastes of space like me who have diagnoses no matter how sick we are….

I remember the attending who complained over my bedside about the cost of the Zofranthat was helping my intense nausea a little to the fellow. As if I wasn’t worth anything. Mysteriously my Zofran was stopped one night and I was wretchedly ill all night until another doctor intervened and gave me back the Zofran.

I remember the nurse who wouldn’t talk to me but would gossip about me to my room mate and other nurses and who contradicted the doctors and also told me I must want to vomit. 

I remember being treated like a piece of meat and dragged from one room to another to be catheterized (now that I have heard the real story from UVAnurses I remember it correctly) because my room bed wasn’t set up for such procedures and I know I ended up with symptoms from this rough treatment for a month.  I remember nobody comforting me or warning me it might hurt as is usual medical procedure but instead scaring me by saying my bladder was 80% full and could burst and it must have been the resident since UVAswears both nurses present say they didn’t say it but mysteriously no one can identify or will identify the resident present.  Her name was on the wall, not so hard to find..

I remember being told my kidneys would be fine or they didn’t know what would happen and not being referred to a nephrologist as I should have been.  I remember leaving UVA in early ‘97 thinking I was the lowest of the low having never been a medical patient before and being in so long treated as the lowest patient of the low, all due to prejudice.  The few polite doctors and nurses stand out they were so rare.

I remember being afraid of doctors for years after this, finally overcoming it and now regaining my fear after 2 unnecessary weeks in UVA 5 East for a steroid reaction an arrogant attending was determined to diagnose as bipolar disorder and even more determined to be absolutely adored and obeyed. 

Most of all I will never forget losing my half-sister because I was drugged up on drugs I should never have been on, withdrawing, forgetting, not myself and having her one visit spend with her refusing to even speak to me.  I will never forget the pain of that nor what UVA doctors did lying to my mother and terrifying her and lying to my brother and scaring him and sending false information about me to all of my doctors without my permission and the threat of being sent to Western if I let my lawyer ask for my medical records or if I exercised my legal right to do so.  Now that I have read them, I know why.  So tomorrow I am not waiting for the “internal and probably endless possible investigation” into falsifying medical records, I’m calling the Charlottesville Commonwealth’s Attorney Office and reporting a crime.  Because who knows how many others have had their records completely falsified to suit some psychiatrist’s power agenda or just need to lie and who knows what damage could be done to another fine UVA program if this complete fabrication got out in court or elsewhere and I care about that unlike UVA 5 East psychiatry. 

Oh, and thanks for the fear of sleeping in my own bed and the need to sleep on my couch with a light on.  PTSD from UVA, the gift that keeps on giving and giving.  A special thanks to my delegate who knew that lowering the standard for commitment was not necessary and pushed it anyway for political reasons.  This is the woman who sat in your office and told you what the commitment rate was and you said it was like hitting a flea with a hammer.  Well I’m one of the fleas who got hit, living in your district, afraid to sleep in my own bed. Thank you Delegate David Toscano, former friend to people with disabilities. You might think about starting an investigation or study into the number of folks involuntarily hospitalized unnecessarily under the laws you passed and the rates of PTSD, unemployment, eviction, divorce, family alienation, even suicide since the rate goes up on release. Don’t worry about me, I’m too busy taking my transplant drugs on time, something 5 East couldn’t manage and too busy fighting back for all the other folks affected to give up, much to some’s chagrin..

Stop the Shame, Stop the Blame, Stop the Threats and Use of Force and Then You Can Talk About “Recovery”

I am exceedingly tired of hearing about recovery by mental health administrators and public providers and even some with lived experience.  It has 1) become another way to make people with emotional issues feel inadequate if they don’t meet societal norms that most without emotional issues don’t meet these days (most American households are single adults, the ranks of the unemployed and underemployed are high, those who don’t comply with health recommendations are legion etc.)  and 2) is not possible in an atmosphere of continued shaming and blaming and high expressed emotion with low willingness to listen by mental health providers, especially in psychiatric units and hospitals and in an atmosphere of coercion with the ultimate threat of violence in a take down and restraint and isolation still available in every psychiatric hospital except perhaps those for the rich and even there those who can not fit in risk transfer to the coercive regular psychiatric hospital.  There can be no recovery in an atmosphere of coercion, blaming and shaming.  Mental health providers, especially psychiatrists, have to stop having it both ways by both insisting people with emotional differences have a real illness and emphasizing to the public and to their patients that they are bad and not good enough for society and need to be fixed to have a reasonable life.   Medical doctors of people with life threatening diseases whose patients may well die on them often do not imply nor tell their patients that they are to blame for their illness and need to take responsibility in order to fit into society.  They offer their advice and voluntary treatment and the best and even the mediocre try to provide hope and encouragement and support for the hard work of medical treatment.  Medical doctors and nurses warn their patients when a procedure will hurt.  Mental health workers and psychiatrists pretend that huting and humiliating their patients by taking them down leaving bruises, injecting them, tying them up and isolating them and mocking them is good treatment and never tell their patients it will hurt them and leave scars that will give them shame and nightmares and fear and low self esteem for the rest of their lives. 

Let us stop pretending we are ready to talk about recovery in a system that still uses power as its main “treatment” modality.  It is not possible, it is harmful and it has already stolen too many lives and souls.  I am taking my soul back but I have lost too many years of my life to the scars of psychiatric mistreatment, not just my kidneys, that is almost the least of it, but the self-blame and the fear and the shame have made me afraid of interaction with others, made me feel less than, enabled a bully in my circle to bully me for 26 years until this weekend when she continued to bully but I broke the cycle by standing up to her, perpetuated my problems and now, after years away from psychiatric power misuse and coercion changed my life yet again, made me question my life, made me fragmented for a time, made me unable to do what I used to be able to do effortlessly.  I will survive and thrive this time because I faced down every implanted fear and shame and lie this time, but how many years were lost, how much potential and how many will not survive and will and are having their lives wasted by the abuse of power and shaming and blaming?  It is time to stop, way past time.  If psychiatry and public mental health systems will not control their own acting out it is time for society to act and take away their power over the lives of others once and for all until they can prove they have anything to offer that is more  helpful than harmful.

Thank You UVA 5 East for Fabricating My Medical Record

Gee, does anyone who knows me think I have a New York City accent, because UVA’s psychiatric record writes that I am from New York and was hospitalized there.  Interesting since I have not visited NYC in 25 years and NEVER lived there.  Also very interesting is that they found it “significant” that I had recently dropped off on my mental health advocacy after being President of the Governor’s Commission on Mental Health.  Well A. There is no such Commission in Virginia, B. I would sure like to have been President of such a Commission if it existed but that was never going to happen in the real world I live in as opposed to UVA psychiatry and C) in what way have I dropped off my mental health advocacy? I am still past-President of the Virginia Mental Health Planning Council and although the powers that be helped by someone I thought was my friend have kept me off every committee of importance other than that since then and even revamped the Supreme Court Commission’s website in such a way that the Commitment Taskforce on which I served and spent much hard work and its non-consensus report is almost impossible to find, I am still here, still advocating, still making noise about human rights and still afflicting the comfortable and comforting the afflicted.  And I still have advocate friends in high places who let me know what is going on and strive to get me included despite the dangers of doing so since I am persona non grata to many people who are not used to any kind of disagreement or criticism from “the likes of me”, a person with lived experience, with years of work experience in the MH system and with a degree, intelligence and a computer to write on……….

There are worse fabrications on my medical record, all from psychiatry and none from nephrology but those must wait for another day when they have been confronted as they involve other people and could terribly hurt a program that helps so many in our region if ever found by a federal agency.  But apparently being right and bullying patients is more important to Dr. B. than the very lives of children and adults in our area.  Not being Dr. B., I won’t endanger their lives because I have something she appears not to have, a conscience and a caring heart and a sense of obligation and gratitude to those who actually save lives instead of destroying them in the name of medicine.  Can we go back to calling hospital psychiatrists alienists now? Pretty please?  The rest of medicine would thank us I am sure.

How Many Dogs and Cats Die or Suffer Each Year Because Virginia’s TDO Screening Does Not Ask About Pets in the Home?

When people are involuntarily detained in an ER in Virginia an unlicensed Community Services Board employee comes in and goes through a screening form which besides not asking about domestic violence, leading to a preventable murder trial in Fairfax in the last few years, also does not ask about pets in the home.  Picture a pet owner strapped to a gurney with a non-licensed clinician going through an inadequate form, trying to answer questions usually after being shot up with Haldol and barely able to speak and ask yourself if the question if not asked, how many barely conscious adults will remember to tell this person with the power of freedom or hell over them that they have a dog or cat at home that needs feeding and walking and tending?  Not too many is my guess.  Do hospitals ask about pets in the home? No, they do not.  So unless the person being locked up against their will for being different or annoying or unable to care for themselves supposedly or suicidal sometimes has friends or family who still act like they care and who have keys to their homes and will take on the care of a dog or a cat, a dog or cat or more than one dog or cat may starve to death or suffer with no water or end up dead for the person locked up “for their own good” to find on their return from the hell that are all our psychiatric hospitals in this great state.  Good job Virginia!

Thank You to 2 Catholic Hospitals for Telling Me Being a Lesbian Was Mental Illness

Misercordia, I don’t remember the psychiatrist’s name, but he was so confident that I was delusional that I was a lesbian.  Sacred Heart Hospital, who violated my rights in so many ways and wanted me to quit graduate school to go on welfare and live in a group home with no sex, I remember your telling me so many times that my lesbian therapist had corrupted and misled me and that you refused to let her visit me.  You kept me so many days longer than others until I gave in and said I wasn’t a lesbian, I was crazy.  Just like 5 East tried to convert me to bipolarism instead of the reality of a common steroid reaction  to for 6 + months, 2 Catholic hospitals tried to convert me to the idea that lesbianism was a delusion and a mental illness.  The only difference is neither of the Catholic hospitals threatened to send me to a state hospital even though that was so much more common all those years ago and 5 East decided I belonged in Western the first day I got there.  For my hereticism I guess.  If psychiatry isn’t a religion, a false one, than I guess it is more like the Spanish Inquisition, but not the funny kind.  Thanks for all you have done to mess up my life with your false prophecy and arrogance and moralism in the guise of medicine and most of all, your bigotry.  Your welcome is that I am still here and I am free to be whoever I want to be and you can not force toxic drugs on me and you can not hinder my free speech outside your snake pits.  Nor can you threaten me with physical assault without being arrested.  So sad.  For you.

Thank You UVA 5 East for the Bruises that Lasted 25 Days, I Finally Went Swimming Today

How could I forget to mention the bright red bruises on both arms that I left UVA5 East with on May 30th? I noticed they were fading to yellow this week and by today they were completely gone, so let’s round it off at 25 days of being marked and reminded of psychiatric assault and being re-traumatized every day even after I left your snake pit.  Huh, you have video cameras in the halls but don’t as is standard practice elsewhere for 20 plus years take a record of marks on your patients as they arrive and leave?  Wonder why.  Well no I don’t wonder why, you have your reasons I’m sure.  Assault is assault is assault.  Oh and how could I forget to mention that the 600+ dollars would have been much more money if I had not requested a change from the dis solvable, newest and most expensive version of Zyprexa that money conscious  UVA  prescribed to me in the hospital while changing my beta blocker to one I wasn’t supposed to have to save money.  Huh, what’s up with that? How much money was my decent insurance charged for an unnecessarily expensive drug proven to “work” no better than generic drugs in many independent studies? Guess that lack of submission of information on drug company ties I blogged on some time ago might mean something after all? Or is it all a big coincidence that the most expensive drug was prescribed to someone with insurance that would pay for any drug inpatient and not to someone whose insurance would not? 

And thanks for suggesting that the nurse who disliked me the most and tried to limit my water supply once which is dangerous to my kidney be one of the people for our informal meeting next week.  Too bad I remembered who she was–see previous nursie post.  Do you really think there is anything any nurse can say that will intimidate or embarrass me? I was given toxic drugs, drugs that made me crazy at dangerous doses, I was not taken off the drug that clearly caused my problem in the first place and now you think I feel responsible for anything I did or didn’t do while I was in your snake pit? That would be a big no or put it this way–I feel as responsible for my behavior as a woman who was given a mickey or GBH by a date.  That of course is a crime in our state, unfortunately what you did to me is still legal for now and unfortunately the chief perpetrator is conveniently out of the country and the hospital’s lawyer, usually so resourceful, just can’t seem to figure out who the 3rd member of the team was, a fellow who will be out of UVA before our meeting.  How convenient this sudden lack of research skills in a long experienced general counsel.  How stupid do you think I am? Keep thinking that way,  I like it, it helps me every time you over estimate yourselves and underestimate me, so keep it up and make me happy.  Except for the bruises and the renewed phobias and the lost time and the money I can’t afford and the worry to my friends, except for all that you arrogant poor excuses for professionals.

Hospital in my Hometown that Psychiatric Solutions Took Over for Profit Now in Trouble

I was so sad when I found out that Psychiatric Solutions had taken over one of the oldest psychiatric hospitals in Philadelphia, a non-profit before Psychiatric Solutions, the Charter of this decade, took over.  Now it seems that yet again where Psychiatric Solutions goes into a hospital patient safety issues follow, issues I never heard of in years of working as a mental health counselor in this hospitals region.  Here is the short blurb in a business blog, strange the mainstream press doesn’t seem to be covering this sad tale of patients endangered for profit,  some of whom are there against their will by the order of a lawyer called a master in a kangaroo court hearing.  Here is the sad blurb:

Psych Solutions replaces Philly hospital CEO

By Geert De Lombaerde Posted on June 23, 2009 at 3:31 pm

After more bad PR over alleged patient safety issues, Franklin-based Psychiatric Solutions has shown the door to the CEO of its Northeast Philadelphia hospital. A national search is underway.

Thank You for Setting Me Back at Least 6 Months in my Recovery 5 East at UVA

Thank you for listening to my mother who was diagnosed bipolar when I was a teenager and never accepted the diagnosis and most likely has PTSD also and is now losing her short term memory as if she were anyone you should listen to about her daughter.  Thank you for calling someone in my family who didn’t even know my diagnosis had changed because we only started talking again recently after I got out of your charming facility with its crazy-making ways. 

Thank you for listening to everyone but me and your preconceived, one size fits all notions, not science nor medicine nor even art about what  my diagnosis must be even as I got worse and worse under your so called care.

Thank you for pretending or actually not knowing what dissociation and sleep walking are even though they are listed in the DSM, the same place your flavor of the day, bipolar, which is not properly treated with atypicals someone has had previous bad reactions to nor with Lamictal which raises creatinine and is bad for kidneys and may cause Parkinsons’ or Tardive Dyskensia in susceptible, such as me, individuals according to an M.D. who is researching this now unlike you whose responsibility it was and most of all, thank you for violating my human rights and the standard of care over and over and over and forcing your resident to sign her name to your so called treatment plans to evade responsibility or because you were too lazy.

Thank you for telling me my bladder would burst if you didn’t do an “in and out” catheterization which you wanted to do in my bedroom until I objected and for not calling in experienced medical nurses to do it leaving me with pain and trouble urinating for several weeks not to mention the nightmares and fear of sleeping in my own bed.

Thank you for assuming me I could not drive at 52 as I was on my way out the door.  Insults are always a great way to say good-byel.

Thank you for confiscating my human rights booklet in my purse which could harm no one but could have helped me a lot.

Thank you leaving me blowing in the wind for services when I left by listing non-available to me services in my discharge plan, the one I never got a copy of but my providers did.

Thank you for discharging me on what your eldest psychiatrist called a dangerous dose of Zyprexa on the pretext that you could not lower it and scaring  me yet again.

Thank you for putting me on 3 drugs that were either listed as ones I could not take or were dangerous to my kidney and over all health, those being Inderal, Zyprexa and Lamictal.

Thank you for the shakes I have from Lamicatal which my nephrologist is resesarching as I write-well hopefully he is sleeping, but he is reseraching it because he said there are bad side effects.

Thank you for ignoring my licensed clinical psychologist and my psychiatrist.

Thank you for my fear of sleeping in my own bed due to putting a male sitter in my bedroom at your fine establishment despite my trauma history, oh right, you don’t believe in trauma, G-d help our veterans when put under your care.

Thank you for threatening me with Western State Hospital for a one time psychiatric side effect from a medication I had been begging to go off for 6 months and still not taking me off of it but choosing to blame and shame me instead and not consult nephrology who could have told you what the problem was.  Oh and a special thanks for being disrespectful to my very well respected and elder nephrologist when he went above and beyond to help me out.

Thank you for not listening.

Thank you for being rude to my lawyer, incredibly rude.

Thank you for scaring me each and every day.

Thank you for not informing me of my rights under Medicare in a way I could understand at the time so I could have avoided the fear of being transferred to Western.

Thank you for making me sleeping for 3 nights through noise and fear the criterion for my release.

Thank you for never offering me comfort nor a therapist to talk to about my fears and trauma in your  unit.

Thank you for allowing a man to touch himself in front of me and a very young woman and not listening to the young woman and letting this man go around looking for who complained about him.  I hope this young woman is okay.

Thank you for being disrespectful, hostile, arrogant and bullying every single treatement “team” meeting.

Thank you for the non-existent referral to available and helpful resources in our town.

Thank you for telling me I did not deserve anything better than traumatic treatment plans.

Thank you for telling me I was not dissociating when I opened the wrong doors when I was and calling me a bad person yet again.

Thank you for your blindness to my actual problem, which was you and steroids and dissociation to escape the trauma of being told my bladder might burst with no gentleness and certainly no debriefing let along ordinary human kindness.

Thank you for letting me know once again what I had suppressed: that I am not a person with rights once in a psychiatric ward.

Thank you for being you, may your treatment team which has bullied and railroaded so many be disbanded by the adults very soon.

Thank you for the flashbacks and the nightmares.

And thank you for every previously overcome phobia which have returned in full force and most of all, thank you for locking me inside for 2 weeks of my favorite time of year: 2 weeks I will never get back and months of recovery from your re-traumatization.

Am I Not a Member of This “Community”?

I was psychiatrically assaulted more than once.   The last time was a month or so ago.  I call the SAARA hot line and am told there is no place for people like me, as I knew there would not be, people, women and men, like me, people who were assaulted in a system everyone in group think thinks is benign, do not need or do not belong in groups for survivors, we should talk to our specialists who of course we already talk to as often as we can after another unearned and violent assault as sexual and pornographic as any rape, tying a woman or man down and injecting them in front of or by men, what is that if not an assault? A sexual assault?  It is not medical treatment, that is a perversion of the term medical treatment.  Yet once again I am told the only resource for people like me is psychiatric and psychological professionals.  This is not unique to Charlottesville, the UVA company town, it happens in every town and every city.  Men and women like me are patronized or avoided or treated like lepers or told to keep quiet if we want to keep our jobs and reputations or chance at friendship and the community support we never get except from each other and a few others who get it sort of.  

I went to church on Sunday.  It had been a long time for me. I exchanged the peace with many in that church including someone who doesn’t agree with me on most things but 2 people who have known me the longest and knew I had been in a psychiatric uni against reason and justice would not exchange the peace with me, pretended not to see me.  This is what we live with as psychiatric survivors.  I will not return to that church.  I will keep looking for a Christian church that takes me as I am or perhaps where no one knows me but why should I have to be ostracized by the fact my assaults came in the medical establishment (and not all did)?  Why is there no group?  Why am I told the only option for people like me is the professionals I already rely on heavily?  Why can I not be a full member of this community with full support or even a little support? Am I not your sister, your daughter, your mother, your aunt? Am I not a person?

What Part of 12 Hours Apart Exactly Doesn’t 5 East Understand Inre Transplant Drugs?

Ever since my transplant in October of 2008 I have taken my anti-rejection drugs 12 hours apart.  It’s not that hard, well not after I learned to use my cell phone alarms, but apparently it is too hard for medical doctors on 5 East to understand and execute.  During my stay they consistently were either late or early with my anti-rejection drugs and when I mentioned 12 hours for all drugs was easier a nurse agreed but doctors did nothing to ensure I got my oh so importantly timed anti-rejection drugs 12 hours apart.   In fact they got me out of the habit of writing down my intake because I was too busy despite all the trauma and chaos trying to remember and memorize when they gave me my medications including the calcitrol which is every other day so I had it written down by week in the nice book transplant gives out at UVA.  These were the people who were protecting me from what?  I never heard and never knew and it’s taking forever even to find out.   Obstruction all they way.  I asked for my papers repeatedly but was always given the wrong ones.  Oh and just to be clear, you can’t discharge someone to home care if they are homebound Ms. Social Worker nor can you discharge someone to a case manager they don’t have, you haven’t made an appointment with and they are not qualified to use under CSB guidelines.  Why? Because I don’t have a serious mental illness, I have PTSD and that’s not serious.  Anyway, a drug reaction with psychiatric side effects is never a serious mental illness.  But hey docs, let’s spend all my precious time converting me to the one true religion of “you have bipolar” despite what everyone who is a professional and known me for years tells you.  Let’s keep trying until you can find someone out of the loop with no reason to know to agree with you.  Nice work 5 East.  Home and well despite you.  Not to spite you, despite you.  Your drugs made me sicker than I have been in years, luckily I have a smart psychiatrist who is rapidly titrating me off of them and a transplant doctor who has seen many cases of steroid induced psychiatric problems.  And a psychologist from heaven who you tried to argue with who would not argue but who has stood by me as has my psychiatrist.   But hey, you must be right, you are UVA (not even in the top 50 or maybe not in the top 100 in psychiatry) Health Systems’ doctors so you must be omniscient, right.  Hubris, not a pretty thing in action.  Oh and your reputation? Not so great among the other patients.  But keep on keeping loving yourself, you do it so well that I don’t have to.

Hey 5 East, You Might Want to Check This Out, It’s in Your Bible. Or Are You Non-Believers or Atheists?

http://allpsych.com/disorders/sleep/sleepwalking.html

Psychiatric Disorders


 

Sleepwalking Disorder (COMING SOON)

 

Category


Sleep Disorders

Someone Alert the True Believers in Psychiatry–Die Gedanken Sind Frei

Sunday Link Fest

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/05/22/advocate_for_others_fights_to_die_at_home/

Judi Chamberlin, an advocaate for the rights of people with psychiatric disabilities for 43 years, is now fighting for her own right to die at home after UnitedHealthcare informed her that her hospice benefit has run out.  Her hospice services have not been cut off as of yet but she is afraid that her daughter will be left with large bills for her care after her death.  

http://psychrights.org/index.htm

“Alaska Supreme Court Grants Mental Patients Constitutional Rights

In an important decision issued today, William S. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric Institute, the Alaska Supreme Court significantly advanced psychiatric patients’ constitutional due process rights when the state seeks to force them to take psychiatric drugs against their will.  “One of the things they held,” said Jim Gottstein, President and CEO of the Law Project for Psychiatric Rights (PsychRights) and the attorney who handled the case, “is that if the State is holding someone in a psychiatric facility, they must provide a feasible alternative to the forced drugging if the alternative satisfies the State’s asserted justification.  The State’s only other option is to let the person go.” The Court also held that in order to allow the person a realistic opportunity to prepare a defense, when filing a forced drugging petition, the State must provide a written statement of the facts underlying the petition, including the reasons for the forced drugging, information about the patient’s symptoms and diagnosis; the medication to be used; the method of administration; the likely dosage; possible side effects, risks and expected benefits; and the risks and benefits of alternative treatments and nontreatment.  “This is very important,” Mr. Gottstein said, “because up until now, they just checked a box that said the person was incompetent to decline and the facility wants to drug the person.  Then the State comes in with a witness who testifies untruthfully and there is no way to have been prepared to rebut it.” 

http://www.theopalproject.org/vigil.html

Esmin Green Did Not Survive. Survivors of Psychiatry & Allies Demand Report from NYC Dept of Investigations

WE THE PEOPLE to Hold a Demonstration and Vigil in Her Memory, June 19, 2009 at Kings County Hospital Center Psychiatric Emergency Room, Building R. from 5-10 Pm. Justice for Esmin Green. Justice for All

ROCKVILLE CENTRE, NY (05/29/2009; 1149)(readMedia)– W E THE PEOPLE is reaching out to friends and family of Esmin Green who was murdered-by-neglect at the Kings County Hospital Center Psychiatric Emergency Room June 19, 2008. They are also looking for survivors of psychiatry, anyone affected by mental health or psychiatric systems, and allies who want to see change and make their voices heard.

Facility staff looked at Esmin face down on the floor – did nothing – and then tried to cover it up. The blatant negligence that was exhibited by facility staff should not be allowed to be brushed under the carpet – or excused for lack of team spirit, which Mr. Aviles, the President of Health and Hospitals Corporation which oversees Kings County Hospital Center, has tried to do. WE THE PEOPLE is demanding criminal charges in this murder-by-neglect and attempted cover-up. This ultimate violation of human rights can not be accepted by our society.

WE THE PEOPLE is demanding that the New York City Department of Investigations release the report of the investigation into the death of Esmin Green and asks why the city is holding back such information?

On June 19, beginning at 5 PM, WE THE PEOPLE will be holding a demonstration calling for human rights in psychiatric systems. A candle light vigil to remember Esmin Green, a woman who should still be alive, will begin at 8 PM.

Sanford Rubenstein, the attorney for the family is a confirmed speaker at the demonstration. He states,
“It is really important for people to make their voices heard so that what happened to Esmin Green never happens again”.

WE THE PEOPLE invite you to stand with them in front of Kings County Hospital Center on June 19, 2009 from 5-10 PM to demand human rights in the psychiatric and mental health systems. Justice for Esmin Green. Justice for all.

Contact: Lauren Tenney (516) 319-4295 Daniel Hazen (301) 395-5378 website: www.TheOpalProject.org/Vigil.html
###

What:
A Call to All People:Stop Human Rights Violations In memory of Esmin Green, murdered-by-neglect, one year later.

Date:
June 19, 2009

Time:
5-10 PM

Location:
Kings County Hospital Center Psychiatric Emergency Room Building R. (Clarkson Avenue at New York Avenue and Winthrop Street) Brooklyn, NY 11203

First Swine Flu Death in Virginia in a State Training Center, What is the Plan to Prevent More Deaths?

People in congregate settings are particularly vulnerable to catching viruses.  It is not surprising at all to me that Virginia’s first death from H1N1 influenza virus was a woman living in  a state training center.   What I want to know and hope others want to know is what is being done to prevent more deaths of people who have been institutionalized by the state of Virginia through no fault of their own.   What exactly is the plan to keep residents of state hospitals and state training centers safe from this and future viruses?  The public but most especially the residents of these state run facilities and their families and friends deserve a real and detailed answer and they/we deserve it now. 

 

Statement OF Governor Kaine

~ On first Virginia death associated with H1N1 influenza virus ~

 

RICHMOND – Governor Timothy M. Kaine released the following statement today regarding the Commonwealth’s first confirmed death associated with the H1N1 influenza virus commonly known as “swine flu”:

 

“The news today that the Commonwealth has witnessed its first death associated with the H1N1 influenza virus is a sad and sharp reminder that Virginians must remain vigilant against the spread of this potentially fatal illness. My heart goes out to the family and friends of the young woman who passed away this afternoon in Chesapeake.

 

“Although this particular individual—a resident at the Southeastern Virginia Training Center—had serious underlying health conditions that likely exacerbated the impact of the H1N1 virus, it is important that all Virginians take the necessary steps to protect ourselves and our loved ones against spreading germs during the normal course of the flu season. Individuals with symptoms should be particularly cautious and take proactive measures to prevent infection and spread of the disease.

 

“I know all Virginians join me in offering our sympathies to the family for their deep personal loss.”

An Old Essay of Mine for World Mental Health Day for our Local MHA-Learning to Cope With the Medical System

Learning to cope with the medical system

February 24, 2007 by hymes

How to reconcile oneself to a medical system that almost killed one and in the end most likely will be the cause of one’s death? I think you don’t, but that instead you make compromises and deals with yourself to do what you need to do to survive and keep the anger intact so that when one wants to despair one can instead say, “I’m not going to let “them” kill me!” in jest, under one’s breath.  And of course one develops a really warped sense of humor or maybe you already had one and that is why you survived in the first place.  Or perhaps a friend is right who says that G-d has a really odd sense of humor.  And seeing a whooping crane, well you have to agree with that.

But day to day the anger can’t keep you going and you have to reach for grace and transcendence.  Friends past and present, living and dead, provide models of how to do this and you think to yourself you will never be as agile as them in handling everything thrown your way but trying makes you quicker on your feet.

You learn to let go of the small stuff and how much stuff is small, you learn to forgive others and yourself for most things and when you can’t you learn to move on.  You learn to smile and laugh at each little piece of beauty that comes your way, whether it is a friend who is there for you or a river beach you didn’t expect or your dogs playing a very silly game they are far too old to be playing.

You begin to accept that these doctors and nurses are neither evil nor saintly but human like yourself no matter whether they agree with that assessment or not and that helps a lot when they disappoint you or hurt you or discount you.  And you learn to treasure the ones who care the way you used to think they all should care, for their worth is beyond measure.

ADAPT Action Report Including Video of ADAPTERs Getting Up Capitol Steps at link Below

http://www.adapt.org/freeourpeople/cca09/video.htm

The Community Choice Act is for all of us and all of our families.  It must not be left out of health care reform for all our sakes.

Florida Allows Their Baker Act to add to Company’s Profit Margin, Is This What We Really Want?

http://www.ocala.com/article/20090425/ARTICLES/904251017/1402/NEWS?Title=Vines-Hospital-now-a-Baker-Act-facility

A Psychiatric Solutions owned facility in Florida has won approval to accept “Baker acted” people over 14 (people who have been committed by the state for inability to care for themselves or danger to themselves and rarely danger to others) as of this past Monday.  The hospital was bought by Psychiatric Solutions, the country’s largest owner or leaser of free standing psychiatric facilities just one year ago.  Pro Publica’s sweeping investigation of Psychiatric Solutions, here: http://www.propublica.org/feature/psychatric-cares-peril-and-profits-psychiatric-solutions-inc , showed that when Psychiatric Solutions buys a facility, trouble for patients often follows but more to the point in this story is the fact that the state of Florida has decided (and this may not be unusual at all), to allow a for profit company to make money out of the state’s detention of individuals who it has deemed vulnerable due to their disability or perceived disability or even just individuals who have disagreed with a psychiatrist’s treatment plan for them as so often happens in commitments in this country. 

Many activists are decrying the privatization of prisons and detention facilities for undocumented immigrants, but we continue to allow the privatization of forced detention of people with psychiatric diagnoses.  So what’s that about? Why no outcry from progressives about this?  Are they just not aware or do they just not care?  No way to know but it is a reasonable question I believe.

Charlottesville Clinic on Fair Housing for People With Disabilities, Tues., April 21st

Fair Housing for People with Disabilities

When: Tuesday, April 21st, 2009, 12:00 to 2:00 PM
Where: Independence Resource Center, 815 Cherry Avenue, Charlottesville
This clinic is designed to give people with disabilities and their advocates detailed information and one-on-one assistance on their fair housing rights.
Highlights:
Learn How the Fair Housing Act Protects People with Physical and Mental Disabilities from Housing Discrimination.
Review the Rights of People with Disabilities to Reasonable Accommodations (changes in rules and policies) and Modifications (structural changes for accessibility) in Housing.
Discuss Examples of Local Housing Discrimination and Successful Advocacy Efforts in Support of Fair Housing Rights.
Get One-on-One Assistance with Your Fair Housing Concern.
Receive Take-Home Materials and Local Resource Information.

Sponsored by: Piedmont Housing Alliance (PHA) & Independence Resource Center (IRC)
This event is free and open to the public, but please register by April 20th. Lunch will be available for all registered attendees.
For more information and to reserve your seat, contact: Tryshan Ravenell at Piedmont Housing Alliance at 817-2436 ext. 113.

Florida Considering Turning a State Hospital Over to a For-Profit Prison and Psychiatric Inpatient Company

http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-04-04/story/hospital_fight_divides_gop_in_legislature

Florida legislators are fighting over whether to privatize Northeast Florida State Hospital and give the contract to run it to the Geo Group–see below to see what else they do:

“Welcome to The GEO Group, Inc. You might already know that GEO is a world leader in privatized correctional and detention management. But did you also know that we offer a wide range of other diversified services – from home detention to the development of residential treatment and mental health facilities?”

According to an article here,”care for each residential patient costs $233 a day, the lowest cost for inpatient psychiatric care in the country” and 4 million dollars would have to be spent to buy out existing employment contracts with current state employees if the hospital was sold to this private prison and psychiatric inpatient company.  It is hard to imagine how such a company could make a profit unless they cut staff, cut training of staff, cut expenses for food and treatment of patients and generally made this psychiatric hospital for people with psychiatric diagnoses committed to the facility by the state of Florida less safe and less patient-centered.

I think it is important to keep an eye on this in every state as states cut budgets, that in the name of budget cutting for-profit companies do not take over and make a profit at the expense of  the least protected groups in our society, both state hospital residents and prisoners both, but especially psychiatric patients who have been most often committed for inability to care for themselves.

More On Psychiatric Solutions from Pro Publica Including Link to Report by University of Illinois Department of Psychiatry

http://s3.amazonaws.com/propublica/assets/docs/DCFS-UICRiveredgeReport040309.pdf   Long report on Illinois Psychiatric Solutions Hospital but includes analysis of company wide issues with accountability.  Prepared by an actual University Department of Psychiatry for the State of Illinois.  Hmm, which University Psychiatry Department in Virginia would be 1)asked to do this by the state of Virginia and 2) do it. 

http://www.propublica.org/article/illinois-report-blasts-care-as-psychiatric-hospitals-0304

State of Illinois puts admissions on hold for troubled Psychiatric Solutions Facility, when will Virginia do the same?

Illinois is actually outraged that children have been hurt, state officials are outraged.  Where is the outrage in Virginia’s state Department of BHDS/DMHMRSAS/DMAS/Governor’s Office/Children’s Advocacy Groups in Virginia? 

Will Virginia be the last state to close this company’s  facilities down as they go under if they do like Charter Hospitals  did?  If so, why?

Nostalgic Look Back at When the U.S. Investigated Charter Psychiatric Hospitals

http://www.nytimes.com/1999/12/30/business/us-is-investigating-charter-hospitals.html

U.S. Is Investigating Charter Hospitals
Published: Thursday, December 30, 1999
 
Magellan Health Services Inc. said today that the Justice Department is conducting a nationwide Medicare fraud investigation of Charter psychiatric hospitals, in which Magellan holds a 10 percent stake.
Magellan, which is based in Columbia, Md., manages psychiatric health plans, and Charter Behavioral Health Systems L.L.C. also face a Justice Department investigation into whether the psychiatric hospitals failed to provide medically necessary treatment, Magellan said in its annual report filed Monday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Magellan disclosed the Justice Department investigation a year ago, and the new filing says for the first time that the investigation is nationwide.

Read the rest at the link on top.

This was right before Bush came into office.  Since then Psychiatric Solutions has grown and shown the same kind of problems as the Charter Hospitals did nationwide, see Pro Publica Investigation in the Links of Interest, but we finally are rid of Bush and I am trying to hope that a new Justice Department and a new CMS will pay heed to the painstaking investigation done by Pro Publica of continuing deaths, assaults, suicides and failure to provide adequate medical treatment in so many psychiatric hospitals and residential treatment centers owned by Psychiatric Solutions and that maybe there are even TV investigative journalist left willing to take this on.  Maybe. 

For those who don’t know, Charter Hospitals closed down nationwide.

Patients Win Settlement against Psychiatric Hospital in Canada for Everyday Practices in the United States

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2009/03/19/pinel-settlement.html

1 million Canadian dollars to 200 former patients for being shackled and strip searched and as mainstream media in Canada describe it “treated like criminals” and “mistreated”.  And supportive comments for the patients by citizens below the story!  Can we bottle whatever they have going in Canada and ship it over the border?

We Must Demand Medical Screening of All Involuntarily Treated People in Our MH System

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/magazine/15wwln-diagnosis-t.html?emc=tnt&tntemail1=y

This woman could have died, now she is medication free.  But if she lived in Virginia or one of the many other states where forced outpatient and inpatient drugging occurs without adequate medical screening, what do you think her chances of survival would have been?  What are the chances anyone would have explored the possibility that she had a tumor and not a mental illness before sentencing/oops I mean “compassionate forced treatment for her own good” her to take drugs that almost killed her against her will? How many others HAVE died in Virginia because their medical condition was never discovered? 

Yes, medical screenings take time and money.  Cost.  Saving lives? Priceless.

Until the Killing of People With Disabilities Is As Important as the Killing of Temporarily Able-Bodied, We Who Believe in Freedom Can Not Rest

People with disabilities are being murdered by family members and caretakers and staff in institutions and allegedly by the Final Exit Network all over this country and this world. (For factual information on how far the Final Exit Networks wants to go including killing people with Alzheimer’s, children with severe disabilities  and any adult who someone considers a burden please read Stephen Drake’s latest post at:  http://notdeadyetnewscommentary.blogspot.com/2009/03/final-exit-advisory-board-members.html )  Until the killing of people with disabilities is as important to our society as the killing of temporarily able-bodied people in this country,  we do not have freedom nor equality and we can not rest until we get it. 

When major media insist on calling alleged forcing of folks to continue with suicide “assisted suicide” instead of murder, when they continue to ignore the non-terminal status and the admission of FEN that they do not restrict their death work to people who are at the end of their natural life, we know how far we have to go before we reach equality, freedom and simple respect for our person-hood. 

Speak up when you hear someone using demeaning terminology about anyone with a disability of any kind.  Don’t be polite about it, don’t let someone else do it, don’t not speak up because you think it isn’t important enough to speak up and educate about, your silence in the presence of demeaning language is taken as agreement, it reinforces the prejudice and it tells people with disabilities that you do not see them as equals no matter how much of a good person you may be.  It takes practice, it takes courage, it takes time and patience and I don’t expect that everyone will be able to do it every time, but if people don’t start practicing, start at least noticing when this demeaning language is being used and thinking of a response later, don’t think about what they could do to be a real ally to people with disabilities when people with disabilities are not there, we will not get there, we will not be free, we will not be equals.  As Romanovsky and Phillips wrote: 

Be Political, Not Polite
When you speak you often use
Some racist word or sexist phrase
That makes me stop you in your tracks
To note the error of your ways
And I know you find it boring
But it seems to me the only way
To correct you, to object to
The hurtful things you say

chorus:
Right the wrongs of human rights
The risk you take could save a life
Silence keeps us all in darkness
We can’t change it overnight
But we can shed a little light
Be political, not polite

I cannot be satisfied
Knowing just how much you care
I want an ally with a voice
Defending me when I’m not there
‘Cause being actively supportive
Is the greatest gift that you could give
By demanding understanding
We can change the world in which we live

(chorus)

Words can hurt, words can heal
Make us think, make us feel
And they’re every bit as deadly
As a bullet tearing through the land
For if our words create the climate
Then the blood is on our hands

Every time we hear a joke
That takes a shot at someone else
If we speak up for their rights
We are speaking for ourselves
‘Cause we will never have true freedom
‘Til everyone one of us is free
From the silence, and the violence
That’s become our history

Treatment Advocacy Center, So Many False Assumptions, So Little Time to Correct Them :)

I know the Treatment Advocacy Center folks are trying very hard to improve their image, I see their efforts to be more compassionate and less fear-mongering about people with psychiatric disabilities/diagnoses/histories, but it seems they just can’t stop themselves from making huge assumptions about the relationship between mental illness and homelessness. 
I wonder if the good folks at the Treatment Advocacy Center are aware of how many people diagnosed with mental illness are put out on the street by their families of origin?  Or how many are not allowed to come home if they leave home and then realize they need support and help only a family could give?  Or how many parents have bought into or been fooled into believing “tough love” is appropriate for their children in emotional distress?  I am aware of it.  I know too many people who as young adults, in some cases very young adults, were disowned by their families because they were given a serious mental illness diagnosis.  It is not the majority of folks of course, but it is a real and not uncommon phenomenon. How exactly will more forced outpatient treatment laws, which is what the good folks at the Treatment Advocacy Center want, help any of these people who have been disowned by their families and forced onto the streets or left on the streets?  If a person, any person, is homeless, what they need first is a home.
And how does the Treatment Advocacy Center make the leap from homelessness to jail? Sure some people end up in jail for status crimes who also happen to be homeless but to write that the choice is homelessness or jails is a big reach.  The choice is giving people who are homeless a place to live and lay their head or not making that commitment as a society and as individuals.  Unfortunately in most places in this country we have not made the commitment to provide a safe place to lay their head for every citizen who through hard times or hard situations or disownment due to emotional crisis has become homeless.  I would opine we have made a bad choice in that regard and that no amount of expensive outpatient commitment programs will help if we do not make the decision as a society to support people through hard times with at least a  bed and food. 
Yes, homelessness will get worse with these bad economic times and yes living on the streets will cause some folks to go into an emotional crisis and all to be unhappy and distressed, how could it not?  But no drug will fix their distress when it is caused by no place to call their own or even a pillow inside to lay their head on.  If a person, any person, is homeless, what they need first is a home.
Okay, that’s all I have time for tonight, tune in for more updates on the good but assumption-prone folks at the Treatment Advocacy Center as I have time. :)
From the Treatment Advocacy Center’s new and improved blog that still allows no comments and has no RSS feed (silly rabbits, no RSS feed is for kids :) ).
“Too many people with mental illness end up homeless. People with untreated psychiatric illnesses constitute one-third, or between 150,000 and 200,000 people, of the estimated 744,000 homeless population. The quality of life for these individuals is abysmal. Many are regularly victimized.

For some of those homeless, it is often part of a cycle between life on the streets and jail.  A choice no one, especially someone with a serious illness, should face.
When someone with a mental illness lives on the streets, they face a number of threats from the environment and weather, the lack of sanitation, theft, and violence.  At any given time, there are approximately twice as many people with untreated severe psychiatric illnesses living on America’s streets than are receiving care in hospital.

Given the current state of the economy, many fear the problem will grow worse. 
“With the nation and state in recession, the problem is likely to grow before it improves, but how a society treats those citizens who most need the help of other people or institutions says a great deal about it,” wrote a recent editorial in the Tennessee Knox News Sentinel.  Like in other states, the jail there has become the state’s largest mental hospital. 

Living on the streets-and all that it entails-is a difficult circumstance for someone without a severe mental illness to adapt.  For someone with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder it can be a living hell. 
There need to be better alternatives.  The choice between life on the streets and jail is not choice at all.  As the Tennessee paper wrote, “Jail is not the proper place for any society to house homeless people with mental health issues.”"

FAIR USE NOTICE: This may contain copyrighted (C ) material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such
material is made available for educational purposes, to advance
understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and
social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a ‘fair
use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C.
section 107 of the US Copyright Law. This material is distributed without
profit.

In Western State Hospital in Virginia, There is a Men’s Only Forensic Ward but No Women’s Only Civil Ward–???

Um, let me try and understand this fact.  Forensic, i.e. Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity or people deemed incapable of assisting in their own defense in a criminal trial and committed to Western for restoration of capacity to stand trial, male, patients have a single gender unit/ward at the hospital.  I do not know if female forensic patients also have a single gender unit.  I do know that patients  civilly (i.e. committed  for lack of ability to care for self, danger to self, very occasionally (the lowest percentage of all commitments) for danger to others do not have any option for a single gender unit or ward, female or male.  How in the world does this make sense?  The state of Virginia uses its power to lock up women and men for being ill or diagnosed as ill by a marriage and family therapist come July 1 or a nurse specialist as of July 1 of last year or other licensed mental health professional for their own protection and than fails to protect them from the risk, a known risk, of sexual assault, of re-traumatization, of being harassed, of being intimidated, of having their religious beliefs violated if they belong to certain religions, of having their very sense of themselves as safe and of the mental health system as safe destroyed or damaged? 

If someone can explain why NO ONE in DMHMRSAS, soon to be DBHDS or anyone else in this state will address this issue at the time a New Western State Hospital is being built, I would appreciate it.  But I don’t think there is an explanation beyond “we just do not get it and we just do not care enough to spend any money to keep women and men safe from trauma at Western State Hospital.”  Why do I think this? Well for one because Virginia’s so called plan to implement trauma informed care on SAMSHA’s website lists someone who is retired as the head of their program to implement trauma-informed care and because outside of one center of excellence there is no plan to implement trauma informed care and no working groups on the issue in Virginia’s public mental health system. 

But don’t let this keep you up at night or worry you or anything, these patients are “other”, they wouldn’t be there if they were not “head cases” or losers or poor or traumatized………oops.

Children Left in Old Vermin-Infested Barracks by North Carolina Mental Health System

Makes Virginia look good anyway….What is wrong with people is all I can really say about this one.  Children as young as 5, not that different than Virginia where children as young as 3 and 4 have been admitted to our children’s state hospital, but in North Carolina  left behind in unhealthy conditions including poor heating in winter and poor air conditioning in summer because they built a new state hospital but didn’t make enough room for children.  Well kids should never be with adults anyway, but what was the plan here?  Throw away the kids?  They are just kids with psychiatric labels so who cares?  They may be foster kids so who cares?  Some will be orphans so who cares?  I’m a little old for the history of the meme “failed” but I think this just might be the place to use it: North Carolina Mental Health System for children for Failed, just Failed. 
RALEIGH, N.C., Feb. 24 (UPI) — Mentally ill children at a state hospital in North Carolina remain in an old Army barracks while older patients have been transferred to a new building. 

Conditions in the John Umstead Hospital are so bad that a job posting for a social worker last year warned potential candidates, The (Raleigh) News & Observer reported.

“Because of the age of the building, there is a constant battle against ants and roaches,” the posting said. “The heating and air conditioning units are unpredictably hot/cold regardless of outside temperatures (i.e. 80-plus degree in summer and/or 50 … in winter).”

The new Central Regional Hospital about a mile from Umstead proved to be too small to take all the patients, so the children , some of them as young as 5, were left behind. About 40 are being treated there. 

In addition to the problems with heat and vermin, the gym was closed down last month to be tested for mold contamination.

Vicki Smith, executive director of Disability Rights North Carolina, said the children should be moved immediately.

“We’ve never been really happy with the kids in the larger facility,” Smith said. “We are less happy with the kids in the old, outdated facility that, quite frankly, they determined was unsuitable for the adults to be in.”

© 2009 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Do You Think You Are In a Home When You Are in a Large Hotel? If Not, Why Would You Think People With Disabilities Do?

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/nyregion/20adult.html?_r=1&emc=tnt&tntemail1=y

After at least 20 years of ongoing coverage of scandals, exploitation, deaths, horrible conditions for people with psychiatric disabilities unfortunate enough to be placed in Adult “Homes” in New York City, a lawsuit to change the practice of forcing thousands of New Yorkers to live in these institutions is going to trial.  Every state has these places, they go under different names in different states.  In Virginia they are called ALF’s of Assisted Living Facilities but not the kind run by Marriot that folks buy into when they get older.  In Pennsylvania they are called boarding homes (or were last I was familiar with them.)  What they all have in common is none of them are “homes”.  If you put over 15 unrelated adults in a building and give them room mates and tell them when they may leave and what they may eat (often sub-standard nutritionally and even in number of calories per day) and what they may do, you are not putting people in a “home”, you are putting them in an institution. 

Nursing homes for folks who could function at home with adequate personal care and nursing assistance are also not “homes”.  We have too many folks in nursing homes as Steve Gold has worked so hard to show over the years that do not need to be there and do not want to be there if we offered them adequate care in their own homes, younger people with disabilities and older people with disabilities and medical conditions that require assistance in daily living.  That is what Aging in Place is about and what activists such as Steve Gold have worked so hard to change. 

Training centers, “Schools” and other names for institutional living for people with intellectual disabilities are not homes either.  And yet they continue to exist in many states, particularly my own state of Virginia and still politicians listen more often to people who are not the people with intellectual disabilities who want a real home nor their allies and advocates but to communities that worry about job loss, to employees who (understandably) worry about job loss or lower pay, to a minority of parents who are very afraid for their own children and may not think about the consequences for other people’s children who could live in the community of insisting on keeping these institutions just as they are.  Fear is understandable of course.  Love of ones child.  Fear of the future.  But it is the responsibility of legislators and others in positions to make these decisions to look at the whole picture and be both brave and careful (and dare I add empathetic?) to the needs and wishes of the majority of folks in these institutions.  For folks who can not live in a home of their own there are other options and these should be carefully and wisely considered and planned for each individual. 

So why the hotel analogy?  Because most people who do not have a disability or who do not love someone with a disability the closest you will come to an institution  being called a “home” as in “home away from home” is to stay in a large hotel.  And you will choose to go to that hotel, you will be free to leave at any time, you will choose your own food and your own bed time, you will do as you like within the ordinary limits of courtesy and legality.  But do you ever think it is a home when you are in a hotel? So why do we persist in calling these large segregating settings for people with disabilities of whatever kind “Homes”?

What I Would Write if Virginia Wasn’t an Authoritarian Commonwealth

What Could Go Wrong If You Don’t Require a Lawyer for Juveniles in Commitment Hearings? This.

Thank you to the Senate Courts of Justice Committee for passing by indefinitely SB 1303 which would have allowed commitment hearings for juveniles to be held without a lawyer and without a Guardian ad litem.  It would have left this up to the judge’s discretion instead of current law which requires the presence of both.  Since juveniles as well as adults can be committed to for-profit psychiatric hospitals, although the story below is beyond rare, in Virginia there was a problem with abuse of process with adults in commitment hearings for gain more than a decade ago.  So by killing this bill, the Senate Courts of Justice Committee has ensured that the below could not happen to teenagers in the psychiatric commitment setting as it did shockingly for years in Pennsylvania in the Juvenile criminal court. 

Pa. judges accused of jailing kids for cash

WILKES-BARRE, Pa. – For years, the juvenile court system in Wilkes-Barre operated like a conveyor belt: Youngsters were brought before judges without a lawyer, given hearings that lasted only a minute or two, and then sent off to juvenile prison for months for minor offenses.

The explanation, prosecutors say, was corruption on the bench.

In one of the most shocking cases of courtroom graft on record, two Pennsylvania judges have been charged with taking millions of dollars in kickbacks to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers.

“I’ve never encountered, and I don’t think that we will in our lifetimes, a case where literally thousands of kids’ lives were just tossed aside in order for a couple of judges to make some money,” said Marsha Levick, an attorney with the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center, which is representing hundreds of youths sentenced in Wilkes-Barre.

Prosecutors say Luzerne County Judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael Conahan took $2.6 million in payoffs to put juvenile offenders in lockups run by PA Child Care LLC and a sister company, Western PA Child Care LLC. The judges were charged on Jan. 26 and removed from the bench by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shortly afterward.

No company officials have been charged, but the investigation is still going on.

The high court, meanwhile, is looking into whether hundreds or even thousands of sentences should be overturned and the juveniles’ records expunged.

Among the offenders were teenagers who were locked up for months for stealing loose change from cars, writing a prank note and possessing drug paraphernalia. Many had never been in trouble before. Some were imprisoned even after probation officers recommended against it.

Many appeared without lawyers, despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 1967 ruling that children have a constitutional right to counsel.

The judges are scheduled to plead guilty to fraud Thursday in federal court. Their plea agreements call for sentences of more than seven years behind bars.

Ciavarella, 58, who presided over Luzerne County’s juvenile court for 12 years, acknowledged last week in a letter to his former colleagues, “I have disgraced my judgeship. My actions have destroyed everything I worked to accomplish and I have only myself to blame.” Ciavarella, though, has denied he got kickbacks for sending youths to prison.

Conahan, 56, has remained silent about the case.

Many Pennsylvania counties contract with privately run juvenile detention centers, paying them either a fixed overall fee or a certain amount per youth, per day.

In Luzerne County, prosecutors say, Conahan shut down the county-run juvenile prison in 2002 and helped the two companies secure rich contracts worth tens of millions of dollars, at least some of that dependent on how many juveniles were locked up.

One of the contracts — a 20-year agreement with PA Child Care worth an estimated $58 million — was later canceled by the county as exorbitant.

The judges are accused of taking payoffs between 2003 and 2006.

Robert J. Powell co-owned PA Child Care and Western PA Child Care until June. His attorney, Mark Sheppard, said his client was the victim of an extortion scheme.

“Bob Powell never solicited a nickel from these judges and really was a victim of their demands,” he said. “These judges made it very plain to Mr. Powell that he was going to be required to pay certain monies.”

For years, youth advocacy groups complained that Ciavarella was ridiculously harsh and ran roughshod over youngsters’ constitutional rights. Ciavarella sent a quarter of his juvenile defendants to detention centers from 2002 to 2006, compared with a statewide rate of one in 10.

The criminal charges confirmed the advocacy groups’ worst suspicions and have called into question all the sentences he pronounced.

Hillary Transue did not have an attorney, nor was she told of her right to one, when she appeared in Ciavarella’s courtroom in 2007 for building a MySpace page that lampooned her assistant principal.

Her mother, Laurene Transue, worked for 16 years in the child services department of another county and said she was certain Hillary would get a slap on the wrist. Instead, Ciavarella sentenced her to three months; she got out after a month, with help from a lawyer.

“I felt so disgraced for a while, like, what do people think of me now?” said Hillary, now 17 and a high school senior who plans to become an English teacher.

Laurene Transue said Ciavarella “was playing God. And not only was he doing that, he was getting money for it. He was betraying the trust put in him to do what is best for children.”

Kurt Kruger, now 22, had never been in trouble with the law until the day police accused him of acting as a lookout while his friend shoplifted less than $200 worth of DVDs from Wal-Mart. He said he didn’t know his friend was going to steal anything.

Kruger pleaded guilty before Ciavarella and spent three days in a company-run juvenile detention center, plus four months at a youth wilderness camp run by a different operator.

“Never in a million years did I think that I would actually get sent away. I was completely destroyed,” said Kruger, who later dropped out of school. He said he wants to get his record expunged, earn his high school equivalency diploma and go to college.

“I got a raw deal, and yeah, it’s not fair,” he said, “but now it’s 100 times bigger than me.”

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press.

SB 1142 Senate Substitute Elimates Civil Rights in Health Care for Every Virginia Citizen

http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?091+ful+SB1142S1

B. If there is no individual eligible to make health care decisions in subsection A, the patient’s attending physician shall be authorized to provide, continue, withhold, or withdraw health care without obtaining a court order if such health care decision has been affirmed and documented as being ethically acceptable by the health care facility’s ethics committee, if one exists, or by two physicians who are not currently involved in the treatment of the patient and who did not make the determination that the patient was incapable of making an informed decision.

If you live long enough or even if you are young, you have every chance of being considered incapacitated at some point through accident or illness.  The Senate version of SB 1142, the bill that allows research not for their benefit on incapacitated and dying patients, now has a section added that says that if you have no advanced directive and no willing or available family member to act on your behalf, two doctors or an ethics committee (who are appointed by hospitals and one of which approved the Ashley X treatment out West) to decide to give you care you may not want or to withhold care you would want if you could communicate your wishes.  This bill essentially leaves no Virginia citizen safe from unwanted medical interventions or unwanted withdrawal of medical interventions.  

In addition, this bill is clearly aimed at people with psychiatric diagnoses, not people with dementia or Alzheimer’s as some have claimed as no where is dementia mentioned, but “severe and persistent mental illness” is specifically mentioned as a grounds for guardianship and a right for a guardian to admit a person without due process to a psychiatric facility for 10 days with no hearing, no lawyer, no protections against abuse of the law by bad actors at ALL. 

You thought last year was bad? This year the Virginia General Assembly is trying to take away all rights to make our own health care decisions if we even end up delirious from a temporary condition and G-d forbid have a disability or illness that some doctors consider our life a “life not worth living” or alternatively some doctor wants to give your family member a drug that could kill them such as an anti-psychotic to an elderly person with dementia instead of Alzheimer’s specific drugs which do not have the high risk of heart attack and stroke that commonly prescribed  psychiatric drugs do to the point where numerous articles clearly not read by the General Assembly have come out this year warning of the dangers to the elderly of psychiatric drugs in common use. 

Your only protection against this bill is to never have a serious car accident resulting in temporary incapacity, not have a label of “serious mental illness” pinned on you at any point in your life and that can be interpreted to include severe depression, to never have an illness that results in temporary unconsciousness, in short, to never get old and never get sick or injured. 

We are back to doctors as G-ds and incredible and dangerous intrusion by the state of Virginia into our most private and personal values and decisions including our right to live. 

This bill is crossing over.  If you don’t care if your civil rights are being further eroded, don’t do anything.  If you do, write your Senator and Delegate and tell them you will not stand for this incredible intrusion into your civil rights and liberty interest in your medical care and in your right to decide how and whether you die.  Or move to another state (except Texas) that still believes in individual rights to puruse life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.  Thomas Jefferson would hang his head in shame and so should the General Assembly of Virginia if they pass this bill as written.

New Blogs on my Blog Roll

Bad Cripple–  http://badcripple.blogspot.com/  a cultural anthropologist writes about disability rights from all kinds of perspectives including his own as someone who was paralyzed 30 years ago at 18 and whose parents fought for his right to rehab. and a real life which he achieved.

http://judi-lifeasahospicepatient.blogspot.com/ Judy Chamberlain, author of On Our Own and so much more as an activist and speaker and leader’s blog on her personal experience as a hospice patient. 

Different Thoughts, Once You Label Me You Negate Me. -Kierkegaard

http://activegreymatter.org/  employment for people with disabilities and much, much more

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/poverty/    Poverty Law Blog

Changing, Evolving, Getting Back to my Roots on this Blog

This blog was intended to be a strategic blog, a political blog, a blog to influence.  And in that choice to make it that kind of blog I lost some of who I want to be, who I used to be when I was quite young actually, who I want to be again.  I read about prison reform when I was 11 from a great present from my parents for children with packets and booklets etc.  I aspired to work on that when I grew up.  It never worked out, for one because my one tour of a prison as an adult freaked me out and I thought I could never do this, and because I went in different directions as an adult.  But in trying to fight for the rights of people labelled with mental illness and to fight the criminalization of psychiatric services and psychiatric hospitals and public perception fueled by propagandists such as the mainstream media and the Treatment (forced treatment only) Advocacy Center, I became a propagandist myself oftentimes and I tried to separate out my principles that prisoners and convicted criminals are people who should be treated as people and given good medical care, rehabilitation if wanted and needed, chances to learn skills, take courses, be prepared for life outside prison and most especially to be safe in prison from assaults and rapes by guards or other prisoners from my principles that people with mental illness labels should not be treated as if they were criminals.  Well no one should be treated as we treat criminals in this country.  No one.  So no longer will I separate out the issues of human rights in the mental health system and human rights in our prisons and jails and justice system.  It is harder to be nuanced, more work, but less emotional toil, more true to myself and less damage to my spirit.

I also believe that it is too early in our civil rights movement as people who have been in the psychiatric system to be thinking we have any real place at the table of decision makers that is not decided and “granted” by the powers that be and that as soon as any of us strays too far from the dominant paradigm of those powers that be we will be excluded from those tables.  And others will be willing to take our place and then learn that they too will be excluded if they stray and have to make their own decisions about how much good they can do versus how much independence they are willing to sacrifice.  Some will do great good despite not being able to state their minds, have and will find ways to do good without losing their place at the table and I think that is great.  But I think we are really at the place where we need to try to capture media attention in non-rigged circumstances to educate the general public on our issues. 

For instance, how many Americans do you think know that forced ECT continues in this country and in this state of Virginia? I suspect  very few folks know that.  How many Americans know the medical and brain damage caused by many of the drugs forced on people in hospitals and now outpatient forced treatment programs?  Not many but maybe a few more as drug companies come under scrutiny more in general.  Still Zyprexa stays on the market having caused more deaths than Vioxx and Vioxx is off the market.  What does that say about where we are in our history as a movement?  I say we are on a hundred year plan.  I say we are where Susan B. Anthony and her colleagues were.  And that we need to act on all fronts but we need to be realistic about where we stand and that to me means we need to find the will and the way and the courage to have protests, old fashioned protests of human rights violations in the mental health system and that we need to think about what will work more than we have. 

But for me it means that this blog will no longer be polemic as it has been at times.  I do not like the way it makes me feel nor act and I am changing it for my own sake.   I am under no illusion that I will not still be considered too “radical” (what a joke!) for the powers that be to be included in their taskforces and hidden committees and committees that mysteriously do not meet or whose meeting times mysteriously don’t reach me even if I am officially on them.  I do not feel bad about being disliked by the powers that be, as the old song says, you ain’t done nothing if you ain’t been called a red, which translates to me as I should be proud of how much animosity there is to me among the powers that be in our Department of MH/BH/MR/SA/DS whatever they are while we await the offensive name change the Department wanted all along and from folks who want me to “just be quiet” in many circles I will not mention. 

I also will not judge those who are in a different place than I.  They are where they are, they do what they do, they are not my concern.

Large Study Shows Mental Illness Without Drug Abuse Is Not Correlated With Violence

International Herald Tribune
Mental illness alone is no trigger for violence
Monday, February 2, 2009

CHICAGO: A new large U.S. study challenges the idea that mental illness alone is a leading cause of violence.

Researchers instead blame a combination of factors, specifically substance abuse and a history of violent acts, that drives up the danger when combined with mental illness in what they call an “intricate link.”

People with serious mental illness, without other big risk factors, are no more violent than most people, according to the study of more than 34,000 U.S. adults. The research was released Monday in Archives of General Psychiatry.

“Mental illness can provide the knee-jerk explanation for the Virginia Tech shootings,” but it’s not a strong predictor of violence by itself, said lead author Eric Elbogen of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine.

Elbogen compiled a “top 10″ list of things that predict violent behavior, based on the analysis.

Younger age topped the list. History of violence came next, followed by male gender, history of juvenile detention, divorce or separation in the past year, history of physical abuse, parental criminal history and unemployment in the past year. Rounding out the list were severe mental illness with substance abuse and being a crime victim in the past year.

After the 2007 Virginia Tech killings by a student ordered to get psychiatric treatment, some states considered laws adding mental health questions to background checks for gun buyers or denying weapons to people who’ve been involuntarily committed for mental health treatment.

The new research, which bolsters other similar findings, raises questions about such laws, experts said. Such legislation may be both ineffective and discourage people who need help from getting treatment.

“We are being misled by our own fears,” said Columbia University psychiatry professor Dr. Paul Appelbaum, who wasn’t involved in the new study. “We ought to be concerned about providing good treatment and helping people lead fulfilling lives, not obsessed with protecting ourselves from phantom threats that appear to be unrelated to mental illness.”

U.S. systems to treat mental illness and substance abuse are separate, uncoordinated and could do a better job treating people with both problems, Appelbaum said.

For the new study, the researchers analyzed data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. The original survey in 2001-2002 involved more than 43,000 face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of American adults. Three years later, many of the same people, more than 34,000, were interviewed again.

Questions about violence in both interviews included:

_”Ever use a weapon like a stick, knife or gun in a fight?”

_”Ever hit someone so hard that you injured them or they had to see a doctor?”

_”Ever start a fire on purpose to destroy someone’s property or just to see it burn?”

_”Ever force someone to have sex with you against their will?”

From the responses, the researchers determined what elements raised the risk of violent behavior.

There were 3,089 people deemed to have severe mental illness — schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression — but no history of either violence or substance abuse. They reported very few violent acts, about 50, between interviews.

But when mental illness was combined with a history of violence and a history of substance abuse, as in about 1,600 people, the risk of future violence increased by a factor of 10.

The relationship between mental illness and violence is there, “but it’s not as strong as people think,” Elbogen said.

Predicting who will act violently is complex, said John Monahan, a psychologist at University of Virginia’s law school, who has done similar research but was not involved in the new study.

“It is true that our crystal balls are very murky,” Monahan said. “The vast majority of violence that occurs in American society has absolutely nothing to do with mental illness.”

The large national survey, conducted by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, included people living in shelters, hotels and group homes, as well as houses and apartments, but it didn’t include people living in hospitals, jails or prisons.

Rosanna Esposito of the nonprofit Treatment Advocacy Center in Arlington, Virginia, applauded the study but pointed out the researchers weren’t able to analyze whether the subjects were in psychiatric treatment or not. Medication for serious mental illness can reduce the risk of violence, she said.

___

On the Net:

Archives of General Psychiatry: http://www.archgenpsychiatry.com

SB1142 Proposes to Violate the Nuremberg Code In One of its Provisions

The hearing for this bill has been moved to this Thursday, February 5th at 9 a.m. in Senate Room B in the Education and Health Committee.

http://www.richmondsunlight.com/bill/2009/sb1142/fulltext/

SB1142: Advance medical directives; revises Health Care Decisions Act regarding.

An advance directive may authorize an agent to approve participation by the declarant in any health care study approved by an institutional review board pursuant to applicable federal regulations, or by a research review committee pursuant to Chapter 5.1 ( 32.1-123 et seq.) of Title 32.1 that (i) snipped OR

(ii) aims to increase scientific understanding of any condition that the declarant may have or otherwise to promote human well-being, even though it offers no prospect of direct benefit to the patient.

 Regulations and Ethical Guidelines

Back to Regulations and Ethical Guidelines Menu

Directives for Human Experimentation

NUREMBERG CODE

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
  4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.
  8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182.. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.

Why Did Republicans Vote to Violate the Nuremberg Code Today? Are They Anti-Life?

What is going on in Virginia’s General Assembly and who is pushing an anti-life agenda through under cover of a mental health bill  and clarifying the Health Care Decisions Act? Yes, anti-life.  Allowing guardians and powers of attorney and oral consent from the dying to experiments that have no expectation of health benefit to them as patients is anti-life and anti-people with disabilities and evil. 

Me, I am going to tear up my living will/durable medical power of attorney when/if this bill/bills pass.  And wait until I move to a less anti-life state than Virginia to write another one.  I never thought I would be writing these words.  Never.  Right and wrong do exist and manipulation and deceit in the service of an anti-life,, anti-disability rights agenda are unethical no matter who you are nor how well you think of yourself and your intellect.  Very intelligent people supported eugenics in Virginia and the rest of the United States.  Very intelligent people supported killing psychiatric patients in hospitals in the ’40’s until the revelations of the Nazi regime made such a stance untenable (or politically incorrect).  Very intelligent people are equally capable of evil acts as anyone else.  And equally likely to be completely lacking in insight into the consequences of their actions on others or perhaps not to care about the effects of their actions on others.

Good News for Children with Disabilities and Their Parents in Virginia

I have to wonder why no Democratic legislators appear to be involved in this effort to protect the rights of children with disabilities and their parents.  Certainly we have Democratic legislators who are familiar with disability issues, so why are they not leading the charge on this extremely important issue of rights to an appropriate and free public education for all Virginia students with disabilities?  Maybe they were left out of the story?

Va. lawmakers: Preserve year for special-ed appeals
Times Dispatch / Olympia Meola
Published: January 28, 2009
State lawmakers don’t want to take a chance that special education students in Virginia will lose their one-year window to appeal a due-process hearing decision, so they are trying to write it into law.
The move circumvents the Virginia Board of Education, which is considering broad changes to the state’s special education regulations, in many instances bringing them in line with federal practices.
Due-process hearings are held to resolve disputes between parents and a school system over special-education services.
Virginia gives parents one year to appeal due-process hearing decisions; federal regulations allow 90 days.
Rather than risk the Board of Education deciding to shorten the time frame extended to Virginia families, House Republican Leader Del. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, wants to codify the practice into law.
The proposed changes to special education regulations have been contentious and drawn thousands of comments from parents, special education advocates, educators and politicians—including high-ranking Republicans in the House of Delegates.
Last fall Speaker of the House William J. Howell, R-Stafford, fired off letters to Board of Education President Mark Emblidge and Secretary of Education Thomas Morris, alerting them to his objections and informing them that lawmakers were prepared to take legislative action if necessary.
Today, House Bill 2304 breezed through the House Education Committee over the objection of the Virginia School Boards Association, which wants to leave the decision to the Board of Education. The board could vote on the regulations in the coming months.
Griffith said parents of special education students in many cases need one year to find an attorney to take their case to court, and then, when they find out how much it will cost, need time to raise the cash. Griffith estimated about 80 percent of parents do not hire an attorney for the due-process hearing.
D. Patrick Lacy Jr., for the Virginia School Boards Association, said disputes should be resolved in a reasonable amount of time. Parents are told where to find help if they choose to appeal the due-process decision, and, he assured the committee, special education lawyers are not hard to come by. “They come out of the woodwork,“ he said.
Not really, countered Darrel Mason, a special education lawyer and former Board of Education member. She said the legal resources parents are given include entities such as the state bar association, and not specific names. Cases are expensive and take hundreds of hours of preparation, she said.
The committee sent the bill out and, Mason, with the Center for Special Education Advocacy, walked away gratified.
“For some time there have been end runs to the legislature by the School Boards, especially in discipline areas,“ she said. “It’s refreshing to see an end run for parents.“
Contact Olympia Meola at (804) 649-6812 or omeola@timesdispatch.com .

Stand Up For What You Know Is Right Even if You Are the Only Voice

Yup, “Behavioral” Is a GREAT Name for DMHMRSAS: This is what Behavioral Looks Like in Practice

 

Our Lady of Peace psychiatric hospital under state investigation

Head-banging incident sparks inquiry at Our Lady of Peace

By Patrick Howington
phowington@courier-journal.com

Locked alone in a room at Our Lady of Peace psychiatric hospital, a 17-year-old girl was allowed to beat her unprotected head on a hard floor more than 120 times last spring while as many as three employees watched.

Those employees — including a behavioral analyst — were trying to determine the cause of the teen’s self-injuring behavior. But now, the Kentucky attorney general’s office is investigating the May 13 session as a possible crime.

The investigation follows an August report from state Cabinet for Health and Family Services inspectors that concluded that the hospital “failed to … assure the safety of the patient.”

Though the girl — whose diagnoses include autism, cerebral palsy and mental retardation — “appeared dazed” afterward, a doctor wasn’t told about the incident until almost 21 hours later. The call was made after hospital staff helping the teen shower noticed a bald spot that was “pretty swollen with popped blood vessels,” one worker told inspectors.

The inspectors’ report, based partly on a video of the procedure, didn’t detail the girl’s eventual medical care or the extent of her injury. She was discharged in August.

Hospital officials declined to give her name or discuss her treatment, citing confidentiality rules. The Courier-Journal obtained the state inspector’s report through a state open-records request.

The state conducted the inspection on behalf of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services — which requires hospitals to meet safety conditions and other requirements to receive federal funding.

The findings prompted the agency to threaten to cut off reimbursements to the Louisville psychiatric hospital and its parent company, Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s HealthCare.

But the cutoff was averted after Our Lady of Peace changed its procedures, including adding a requirement that doctors be involved in such assessments.

Based on those changes, the Medicare program told hospital officials Sept. 12 that the facility was back in compliance with federal regulations.

“We’re trying to put in every single protection and process and policy in place to prevent any injury to any patient,” said Thomas Gessel, the hospital’s interim chief executive. “We want to make sure that we have a safe environment.”

Allison Martin, spokeswoman for Attorney General Jack Conway, confirmed Friday that the office’s Medicaid Fraud and Abuse unit is investigating the incident.

The case was referred to the office by the health services cabinet’s Child Protective Services section in July, she said.

Martin said that she could not release details of the investigation. No charges have been filed.

When asked why the six-month-old investigation has not been concluded, she said: “It’s a complex issue (and) we are looking at many different factors … and it is our goal to be thorough.”

She said Conway wasn’t available for an interview Friday because he was traveling out of state.

JoAnne Maamry, chief executive officer of Our Lady of Peace at the time of the incident, resigned in August. She is not working now.

Reached by e-mail, Maamry declined to comment on the case or her resignation.

Gessel, the interim chief, would not say if Maamry’s resignation was related to the incident, saying personnel matters are confidential.

He also said the hospital provided the attorney general’s office with some documents it asked for, but he said he doesn’t know more about the criminal investigation.

‘Assessments’ are rare

Our Lady of Peace, on Newburg Road, is one of the nation’s largest nonprofit psychiatric hospitals.

About 70 percent of its patients are younger than 18, many of them wards of the state.

Gessel said “functional analysis assessments” of disturbed and uncommunicative patients — which can include watching them hurt themselves — are fairly rare at the hospital, used on 20 or fewer patients last year.

They are made by behavioral analysts — certified clinicians who typically have advanced degrees but are not doctors or nurses.

But such assessments were suspended in August and won’t resume until safety policies are honed, Gessel said.

In a plan of corrections submitted to state and federal authorities in September, Jewish Hospital & St. Mary’s pledged that procedures for functional analysis assessments would be revised to require doctors’ involvement and having nurses present.

The company also said hospital staff would be trained to determine how long an assessment exercise should last, grounds for stopping it, and the use of protective equipment.

Despite agreeing to those and other changes, however, the company disputed that it had been out of compliance with health-care regulations.

The May 13 session involving the 17-year-old girl consisted of five 10-minute segments, including one in which she was alone, inspectors reported.

Staff members conducting the session disregarded an order from the patient’s doctor to put a helmet on her if she began banging her head, the state report said.

The behavioral analyst in charge of the session — whom the hospital refused to identify — later told inspectors that despite the doctor’s order, it was his decision when to apply the helmet, and that nurses were not present because “they would stop the session.”

After the patient hit her head on the tile-over-concrete floor 129 times, intermittently biting her arms, employees put a helmet on her. She then stopped the banging, the report said.

“The patient appeared dazed, as she swayed back and forth while knocking on the door to get staff’s attention to let her out of the room,” the report said.

Michelle Spurlock, chief nursing officer and vice president of Our Lady of Peace, would not say whether the analyst was disciplined over the incident. She said he is still employed there.

National experts on autism said that while an observation session is a valid diagnostic method, the May 13 session lacked the proper controls.

If patients regularly bang their heads, watching the behavior can help “understand what sets it off, what keeps it going,” said Dr. Fred Volkmar, director of the Child Study Center at the Yale University School of Medicine. But, “you want to be sure, first and foremost, of the person’s safety.”

“It sounds like the behavior analyst did not display good clinical judgment,” said Robert LaRue, assistant director of research and training at Rutgers University’s Douglas Developmental Disabilities Center and a certified behavioral analyst. “If you’re letting a kid hit a hard linoleum or concrete floor 130 times, you’re probably not doing it right.”

LaRue said that with a head-banging patient, he might change the assessment procedure to measure how fast a stimulus such as noise triggered head banging, rather than how long the banging lasted.

“They’re lucky that she didn’t split her forehead open,” said Sandra Harris, executive director of the Rutgers center, who has studied autism since 1972.

State inspectors’ report

In their report, the state inspectors concluded that Our Lady of Peace lacked procedures to make sure such patients received prompt medical attention.

They also wrote that hospital officials failed to thoroughly investigate the incident, reprimanded a nurse who reported it to the patient’s doctor, wrongly secluded the patient in a locked room without a doctor’s approval and failed to report the incident to state authorities.

Spurlock said the locks have been removed from the treatment room since the report was written.

Gessel said that he does not know why the incident was not reported, because it is the hospital’s normal practice to do that.

State inspectors also said the hospital failed to ask the patient’s legally appointed state guardian for permission to conduct the assessment. The guardian told inspectors that she would not have consented to an assessment that allowed the girl to continuously bang her head.

The guardian also wasn’t told that an X-ray of the patient’s head was performed and wasn’t given the results, the report said.

Reporter Patrick Howington can be reached at (502) 582-4229.

To Improve Psychiatric Care, We Have to Start By Reforming Our Jails and Prisons for Adults and Teens

Every time there is a chance of closing a state mental institution people of good will and concern speak up and object.  Why? Why when they know most of these state institutions, especially for children and teens, are not good places for anyone to be?  The answer is that our juvenile detention centers are run like adult prisons and our adult prisons are run like Hells on earth.  We have completely given up on rehabilitation, second chances such as parole in Virginia, educational opportunities for adults in prison, decent, even semi-adequate medical care to the point that people die simply because they are in prison when they get sick, we do nothing about prison rape, even joke about it, we have thrown prisoners, adult and children away as if they were not even human. 

So anyone who has been inside of a jail, prison or juvenile detention center is going to look at a state run facility, no matter how many human rights violations, excessive restraints, patient on patient violence occurrences due to mixing of people who should not be mixed together due to archaic NGRI release policies, even deaths as at Central State Hospital, and think, “well, it’s not as bad as prison or a juvenile detention center.”  And it isn’t.  But that should not be our basis for comparison, people with illnesses who have not committed a crime, 3 year olds who should never be in a state psychiatric institution, should not have to suffer institutional abuse because we have not had the political will to reform our prisons, jails and juvenile detention centers.

So let’s start where we need to start.  Let’s start on prison reform, it’s only as old an idea as the nineteenth century, we’re only in the 21st century, could we just maybe go forwards instead of backwards?

Behavioral Health May Be A More Honest Description of What DMHMRSAS Does and Cares About

I object to to the term “behavioral health”, a term invented by managed care companies, not by individuals who seek mental health or substance use disorder services nor by the folks who treat them.  It is insulting, offensive, all that.  It is the same name used for the sex offender facility in this state.  It is stigmatizing, prejudicial.  But perhaps, for once, the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse is being honest about who they are and what they do and care about by pushing this name on us with a push poll on their site in the summer in which 3 out of 4 choices included behavioral health and the 4th was too vague to be usable. 

Because DMHMRSAS does care and act only on behavior, not emotions and feelings of people served by it.  DMHMRSAS does not care as an agency about the feelings of people with mental illness nor people with substance use disorders nor people with intellectual disabilities.  They offer practically no services that help people deal with feelings, they do not mandate counseling of any kind in their community services nor in their state hospitals.  They sometimes “act” as if they care about advocates with mental illness they are forced into contact with by federal and state mandates, but most of them, most of the time, are only acting as if they care and a few of them, only if others are watching them. 

So I will oppose this name change but if it passes anyway, I will have the satisfaction of knowing that DMHMRSAS has been forced to be honest for once about who they are and what they do and  who they care about and who they do not care about.  And that’s something.  Not much, but something, because honesty from DMHMRSAS?  Really, that’s priceless.

2 Virginia Psychiatric Solutions Owned Facilities Seek Permission to Break Human Rights Regulations at State Human Rights Committee Meeting on Jan. 23rd in Richmond

 

 

 

 

Notice

The State Human Rights Committee

will consider a request for variance to the

 

Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals Receiving Services from Providers Licensed, Funded or Operated by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse Services

 

at its meeting on

January 23, 2009

Request for approval of variances will be considered from the following providers:

Virginia Beach Psychiatric Center

12 VAC 35-115-110, C16, Time Out

Poplar Springs Hospital

12 VAC 35-115-110, B16, Time Out

Youth

Please consider attending this State Human Rights Committee meeting in Richmond in a show of support for children and adults in facilities owned by Psychiatric Solutions in Virginia as they seek “variances” (permission to legally violate state human rights rules and regulations) for two of their facilities.  You may be excluded from the actual variance hearing but your presence will mean something to the State Human Rights Committee and to these patients and their families.

http://www.dmhmrsas.virginia.gov/documents/HumanRights/ohr-SHRCvariance2009-0123.pdf

 

Psychiatric Solutions Owned Facilities in Virginia–Be Aware, Be Safe

Read Pro Publica’s year end wrap up of their extensive investigation of Psychiatric Solutions facilities across the country here:  http://www.propublica.org/feature/where-things-stand-troubles-with-private-mental-hospital-conglomerate-1231

Virginia

Crawford First Education
825 Crawford Parkway
Portsmouth, VA 23704
757-391-6675 (Phone)
757-391-6651 (Fax)

Cumberland Hospital
9407 Cumberland Road
New Kent, VA 23124
800-368-3472 (Toll Free)
804-966-2242 (Phone)
804-966-5639 (Fax)

First Home Care
1634 London Blvd.
Portsmouth, VA 23704
757-393-7211 (Phone)
757-393-7219 (Fax)

The Hughes Center for Exceptional Children
1601 Franklin Turnpike
Danville, VA 24540
434-836-8500 (Phone)
434-836-8552 (Fax)

Liberty Point Healthcare, Inc.
1110 Montgomery Avenue
Staunton, VA 24401
540-213-0450 (Phone)
540-213-0456 (Fax)
800-496-7941 (Toll Free)

North Spring Behavioral Healthcare, Inc.
42009 Victory Lane
Leesburg, VA 20176
703-777-0800 (Phone)

The Pines Residential Treatment Center
825 Crawford Parkway
Portsmouth, VA 23704
757-393-0061 (Phone)
877-227-7000 (Admissions)

Poplar Springs Hospital
350 Poplar Dr.
Petersburg, VA 23805
804-733-6874 (Phone)
804-861-0076 (Fax)

Virginia Beach Psychiatric Center (VBPC)
1100 First Colonial Road
Virginia Beach, VA 23454
757-496-6000 (Phone)
757-496-4550 (Fax)

Whisper Ridge Behavioral Health System
2101 Arlington Boulevard
Charlottesville, VA 22903
434-977-1523 (Phone)
434-872-1573 (Fax)

Psychiatric Technicians, Psychologists Among Health Workers Not Checked For Criminal Pasts

Many California Health Workers Not Checked for Criminal Pasts

by Charles Ornstein and Tracy Weber December 29, 2008 9:25 pm EST
Tags: California, Nurses

This story was co-published with the Los Angeles Times and also will appear in the Times‘ Dec. 30, 2008 edition.

 

Michael Marcus, a dentist from San Jose, Calif., was arrested in July 2005 for allegedly touching a 17-year-old patient's breasts and making inappropriate comments to her during an exam. Although he is set to stand trial next month, he still practices without restriction. Marcus said the criminal charges are not true.
Michael Marcus, a dentist from San Jose, Calif., was arrested in July 2005 for allegedly touching a 17-year-old patient’s breasts and making inappropriate comments to her during an exam. Although he is set to stand trial next month, he still practices without restriction. Marcus said the criminal charges are not true.
California’s failure to check the criminal backgrounds of health professionals extends well beyond nurses, encompassing tens of thousands of doctors, dentists, psychiatric technicians and therapists.

 

The Times reported this fall that regulators had not vetted about 195,000 of the state’s registered and vocational nurses, exposing patients to caregivers with histories of violence, addiction, predatory behavior or corruption.

Prompted by those articles, the state Department of Consumer Affairs has identified 104,000 more professionals from all levels of medical care to add to that tally.

All told, the agency now estimates that close to a third of the state’s 937,100 licensed healthcare workers have not been screened through fingerprint checks.

Licensing boards maintain inconsistent rules about who must be fingerprinted and when. Fingerprints are the primary tool that regulators can use to root out convictions and allow law enforcement agencies to automatically alert regulators if a licensee has ever been arrested.

Those who have not been fingerprinted include almost three-quarters of psychiatric technicians; nearly half of family therapists, social workers and dentists; and 12 percent of physicians.

“We depend on the state of California…to screen out those who are incompetent or impaired or dishonest or otherwise unqualified,” said Julianne D’Angelo Fellmeth, administrative director of the Center for Public Interest Law at the University of San Diego. “If the state doesn’t do that for whatever reason, we’re all in trouble.”

After the reports by the Times, which collaborated with the investigative news organization ProPublica, the state Department of Consumer Affairs moved quickly.

Agency Director Carrie Lopez ordered the 20 health-related boards and bureaus she oversees, including the Medical Board of California, to collect fingerprints from any licensee who had not provided them.

She also told the agencies to begin asking licensees whether they had been convicted of a crime since their last renewal. Other states’ boards, including those in Arizona and Texas, already do that.

Lopez urged regulators to more quickly pursue professionals who may pose a danger to the public.

“I have and fully intend to make use of all resources to ensure that we remove threats to the public safety and well-being of Californians,” Lopez said in a written statement.

The Board of Registered Nursing received expedited approval from the state Office of Administrative Law last month to collect fingerprints from the 147,000 nurses licensed before 1990. The board estimated that the new fingerprinting requirement will cost more than $4 million to implement over the first three years and $1.7 million annually thereafter.

In seeking the requirement, nursing board officials wrote that the Times’ “articles packaged information in a different way and in a different light than the board had done in the past. Moreover, these articles raised the issue with respect to specific licensees with notable criminal histories that the board had never disciplined.”

The Bureau of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians plans to seek a fast-track review for proposed fingerprint regulations. It also has sought to discipline some of those mentioned in the Times’ articles, including Cynthia Knott, convicted in 2007 for selling drugs that had been stolen from her job at the Fresno County Jail to an undercover investigator.

The consumer affairs department, which oversees all licensed professionals in the state, said it is focusing on healthcare first but intends to expand fingerprinting to other boards as well, including those that govern auto repair and contractors.

Fingerprinting requirements originally were adopted because boards believed that some crimes could reflect poorly on a licensee’s character, competence or ability to safely perform the job.

But gathering missing fingerprints has not been a priority.

The Dental Bureau of California, for example, started requiring fingerprints in 1986 but has almost none on file for any dentist licensed before then — some 16,000 people, said Cathleen Poncabare, the board’s executive officer.

 

 

Kiyoshi Fukuda, a dentist from Santa Rosa, is a registered sex offender.
Kiyoshi Fukuda, a dentist from Santa Rosa, is a registered sex offender.
The new background checks will probably flag such cases as that of Kiyoshi Fukuda, a dentist from Santa Rosa.

 

Licensed in 1969, he has a clear record, according to the bureau’s Web site. Yet reporters found that he is a registered sex offender, listed on the state’s Megan’s Law Web site.

Fukuda, 63, was convicted in 1990 of two counts of oral copulation on a child under 16.

 

In an interview, Fukuda said he had disclosed his conviction to the board when he renewed his license years ago and never heard anything back. He closed his private practice in January and said he recently sent a request to the dental board to cancel his license.

The conviction “did not have anything to do with my office, my profession or anything. It was something that was on the private side. But should they have checked? My guess would be yes. …I’ve done everything since then to try to atone for this,” he said.

Poncabare, who has been in her post about six months, said she couldn’t explain why the bureau did not seek fingerprints from every dentist sooner.

“It’s perplexing to me that it was never done,” she said.

Fingerprinting is not always the issue. Some licensing boards have known about professionals’ convictions or pending charges for years but still have not acted.

Michael Marcus, a dentist from San Jose, for example, was arrested in July 2005 for allegedly touching a 17-year-old patient’s breasts and making inappropriate comments to her during an exam.

Prosecutors charged him with misdemeanor sexual battery against three patients, and he is set to stand trial next month. Although the dental board cooperated in the investigation, Marcus continues to practice without restriction, and the board’s Web site lists only a previous disciplinary action against him from 1996. In that case, the dental board suspended him for 30 days and placed him on five years’ probation for fondling the breasts of three patients.

In an interview, Marcus said the criminal charges are not true and should be dealt with by the courts before any action is taken by the dental board. A spokesman for the Department of Consumer Affairs said the board was aware of the case but could not comment on it.

Laura Moskowitz, a staff attorney for the National Employment Law Project in Oakland, said the state should proceed with caution as it gathers arrest and conviction information on health professionals. The law requires proof that the convictions are “substantially related” to the qualifications and duties of the job, she said.

“There are thousands and thousands of people who may have had something happen in the past, and it’s not reflective of who they are today and the kind of work they can perform,” she said.

The Times and ProPublica have found more than 115 recent cases involving registered nurses and an additional 27 cases among vocational nurses in which the state didn’t seek to pull or restrict their licenses until they had racked up three or more convictions.

Many of the convictions involved off-the-job incidents, such as driving while intoxicated, stealing and taking drugs, or petty thefts. But the chaos and impairment often affected the nurses’ ability to care for patients, sometimes in critical-care settings.

 

Weeks later, Cahill-Therrien was fired from a different hospital job after she appeared to be drunk and refused to take a drug and alcohol screening test. Even after the board filed an accusation against her, she was able to get work at another hospital. She was fired after showing up drunk there too, the judge wrote. Her license was revoked in 2007.

Cahill-Therrien could not be reached for comment. Her former attorney declined to discuss her case, citing attorney-client confidentiality.

Linda Whitney, chief of legislation for the medical board, which oversees about 125,000 physicians, said her board plans to seek prints from up to 15,000 physicians licensed before 1968, who have never provided them. But, she said, her board has long used other methods to snag convictions among doctors.

“Could something slip through the cracks? Absolutely,” she said. “There could be a doctor licensed in 1965 that could be convicted next week and we may never hear about it. …For consumer protection, which is our No. 1 mission, we don’t want even one to slip through the cracks.”

This story was co-published with the Los Angeles Times and also appears in the Times‘ Dec. 30, 2008 edition.

ProPublica Investigation: California’s Criminal Nurses
The Stats on Fingerprinting
Document Dive

© Copyright 2008 Pro Publica Inc.

REPRINTS

You can republish our articles for free, if you credit us, link to us, and don’t edit our material or sell it separately. (We’re licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details.)

Regressive Mental Health Laws Inhibit Free Speech

Someone once told me that I don’t share enough about myself on this blog.  I didn’t agree but it is true that there are many important things I never write about on this blog.  Why? Because Virginia, and to be fair, most other states in this country, have now passed such regressive commitment laws that they inhibit my free speech.  Anything I put on this blog could and would be used against me in the kangaroo court they call a civil commitment proceeding under the regressive laws passed as “reform” last year due to the high emotions after Virginia Tech. in which no leader in this state was willing to step up and ask citizens not to take their feelings out on everyone with a psychiatric label or history or mislabel or even the perception of such.  Even George W. Bush eventually spoke publically of the need not to scapegoat American citizens who happened to be Muslim or from the Middle East after 9/11.  But no one in this state had the courage (sic) of George W. Bush when it came to people with psychiatric labels. 

So I don’t write as much these days.  I value honesty and full disclosure, but I value my health and well being and freedom more.   But hey,  free speech isn’t for people like me anyway, who do I think I am?  A law abiding citizen who has never even gotten a parking ticket and has voted  in every election since I was 18 except one where I was too ill? A volunteer for many groups in my community who has probably spent more money volunteering than I ever earned working?  People like me absolutely should not have free speech, that just makes good……..prejudice and bigotry and intimidation.

Who Would Lock Up Jesus Christ? The State of Virginia, That’s Who

Questioning the authority of the government, getting angry and knocking over furniture (tables in front of the temple), announcing he was the Son of G-d, attracting crowds, walking on water, preaching outside, not in a church or synagogue, no visible means of support, no home of his own, walking everywhere, upsetting people of means and status, of course Jesus Christ would be commitable under the current and soon to come lowered standards for involuntary commitment to a mental hospital in Virginia. 

But, you say, there was that one, that one who shot people up, he was one of “them”, even if he wasn’t really, even if he had a very rare disorder and even if most of “them” are less likely to be violent than the general population, still we must make an example of all of “them” because of that one.  We need someone to blame, of course we do, in fact, as we did 2,000 years ago, we need a scapegoat, someone or some group to take the blame for our own sins and our own faults and omissions.  Human beings have had scapegoats for thousands of years, why should the present be any different?  But it’s medicine or science you say.  No, it’s not.  It’s social control and it’s intolerance of difference and it’s archaic and brutal and largely avoidable if voluntary CARE is available to all, which it is not.  But never mind, we need scapegoats.  And we forget, those of us who are Christian, that G-d already gave us His only Son so that we would not need to scapegoat each other anymore. 

Merry Christmas.

In France, Psychiatrists Join With Psychiatric Patients in Opposing MOT, Seclusion and National Database of Commitments!

In response to this question, the majority of health care professionals would say that more and more frequently mental health patients are badly cared for both in hospital and when back at home. That is why health professionals and patient support organisations are widely opposed to Sarkozy’s plan.

I wish I was better at learning languages.  Despite several years of studying French, my speaking fluency never reached a high level.  It is so amazing to me, so heartening, so hopeful and yet so discouraging, to see a country where psychiatrists and other mental health professionals are protesting proposed further oppression of psychiatric patients.  They are opposing more seclusion, opposing a national database of involuntary commitments–USA has one and now the FBI has it too–actually telling the truth that psychiatric patients are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators, opposing making psychiatric hospitals more prison like and opposing restrictions on outings for patients. 

If psychiatrists in France can be on the same side as their patients, why do we continue to have such refusal to even talk to survivors of psychiatry in the U.S.?  The APA doesn’t want to talk to patients unless they are telling a story of how psychiatry saved their life.  They want to talk to the parents of patients AKA NAMI and ally themselves with them, despite the fact that NAMI supports allowing psychologists to prescribe and most patients and most psychiatrists do not.  What is the APA afraid of?  Or is it just that they feel they are too good to associate with ex-patients in anything but a paternalistic manner? What is DMHMRSAS of Virginia afraid of when they  act two-faced and passive aggressively towards any ex-patient who is critical of them? What would it be like to have a Department of Mental Health that was not fear and retaliation based, where money was not given out based on toeing the party line and not speaking up too loudly or too critically?  Where promises were kept, legitimate business phone calls were returned, opinions did not sway with the wind of politics, accountability was not a dirty word and DMHRMSAS knew what most mature adults in organizations know, that their critics are their best friends in improving their organizations? I must be high on Christmas candy to even dream of such a state of affairs…….

California Attorney General Jerry Brown Asks State Supreme Court to Overturn Proposition 8

12-19) 19:43 PST SAN FRANCISCO — State Attorney General Jerry Brown, in a surprise turnabout, asked the California Supreme Court on Friday to overturn Proposition 8, saying the voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage violates basic rights guaranteed in the state Constitution.  Read more:

As a Transplant Recipient, I Lament the Acquittal of Ruben Navarro’s Doctor

The transplant surgeon who hastened the death of Ruben Navarro, a person with disabilities, in order to retrieve his organs, was acquitted.  He still faces a  medical board and one can hope that prescribing a deadly cocktail to a patient without their own consent and knowledge of their wishes and not for their benefit but for the benefit of others will lead to disciplinary action by the California medical board. 

It is clear that many hands were involved in this tragedy.  A newly minted transplant surgeon was sent to an unfamiliar hospital to oversee a procedure the hospital had never performed before, donation after cardiac death.  The transplant surgeon was allowed to be involved in the patient’s treatment, a violation of protocol at all reputable transplant centers as far as I know.  But for no one to be held accountable for the killing of Ruben Navarro is tragic and indicative of the lack of protection and respect for the rights of people with severe disabilities even at the end of their lives.   This is a very sad day for transplant recipients and those waiting for transplants but most of all it is a very sad day for people living and dying  with disabilities.

Modern KKK Tactics in Katrina’s Aftermath Documented by the Nation Institute

Katrina’s Hidden Race War produced by the Nation Institute.  Documents white residents of town on the way to a Katrina evacuation point that was dry shooting randomly and maliciously at innocent African Americans escaping New Orleans and even threatening their African American neighbors who had lived there all along.  Why was there no coverage of this in the mainstream media?  Why is this only coming out now. How can it be that not one person has been arrested for these crimes?  And can folks stop repeating the idiotic idea that our race problems in this country were solved by the election of Barack Obama?

Why Confidentiality of Mental Health Records Matters

A pastor is alleging abuse and degrading treatment by police and West Virginia law allows the defense to obtain all records from his pastoral counselor and abuse him all over again as well as intimidate future potential litigants and anyone with a psychiatric label from suing when  officials abuse their authority.

http://www.huntingtonnews.net/local/081213-rutherford-localdeposition.html

Deposition Coming in Federal Civil Rights Litigation
Demands Disclosure of Pastoral Counseling-Psychotherapy Notes

 
By Tony Rutherford
Huntingtonnews.net Reporter
 
Huntington, WV (HNN)– A notice for a discovery deposition of Pastor Paul Willis, First Baptist Church, 801 Sixth Avenue, Huntington, WV has been filed in federal court. The filing relates to Richard K. Revely is the plaintiff in a civil rights suit against the City of Huntington, Huntington Police Department, and Sgt. D. Booth, as well as Larry Parsons, Administrator of the Western Regional Jail; V.L. Greene, Chief Correctional Officer; and Sgt. Christopher D. Fleming.
 
According to the complaint, Rev. Revely alleged that HPD used excessive force, mistaking him for a possible drug dealer since his car at that time still had Michigan license plates. He moved his family to Huntington to assume an assistant pastor position at First Baptist Church.
 
Based on the complaint, an officer with gun drawn sprayed and kept the plaintiff face down in the mud, did not read Miranda Rights, and then kept restrained in a chair at the Western Regional Jail as he prayed due to no one allowing him to wash the spray from his eyes. “Officers [at the jail] mocked him being a minister saying he was a Jim Jones who would give Kool-Aid to his church members, made crude sounds, and honked a loud horn that made pig sounds several times in both ears…[after the chair broke] as he continued to pray, a guard used the handle end of a push broom to hit Revely’s hand and wrist and prod him in the stomach and genital area.” You can download the full complaint here: http://www.huntingtonnews.net/local/ministercomplaint.pdf
 
Revely and his wife have undergone pastoral counseling since the incident. The “Discovery Deposition Duces Tecum of Pastor Paul Willis” instructs that said Pastor must bring the following documents to the December 22, 2008 proceeding: “The original and entire file maintained by Pastor Paul Willis on Richard Revely, including, but not limited to: office notes, progress notes, test results, invoices and any other documents relating to counseling, treatment, tests or examinations rendered… this includes records relating to treatment for mental health , counseling, sexually transmitted diseases, alcohol use or abuse, drug usage, and psychotherapy notes.”
 
Although widely perceived as privileged or private, the State of West Virginia does not have a privilege in litigation for psychotherapy records and progress notes. The U.S. Supreme Court extended a federal privilege in the 1996 Jaffee v. Redmond case, involving a police officer who sought counseling after she shot and killed a suspect.
 
Defense counsel often use the bare allegation of “emotional distress” or “mental anguish” in attempts to gain full access to all materials, not just those relevant to the case, which then has a chilling impact on privacy for matters not at issue in the litigation.

Action Alert on ADA Amendments Act from JFActivist–Call Today

Action Alert: Tell EEOC Not to Rush 11th Hour ADA Amendments Act Regulations TODAY

* * * Immediate Action Necessary * * *


Tell EEOC Not to Rush Through 11th Hour ADA Amendments Act Regulations

AAPD staff have learned that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has scheduled a Commission meeting for this Thursday, December 11 at 2 p.m. to discuss regulations interpreting the new ADA Amendments Act that was signed into law by President Bush on September 25.  We have learned that one of the potential items for discussion is a new “Interim Final Rule” interpreting the new ADA Amendments Act that would take effect concurrent with the statute’s effective date on January 1, 2009.  If the Commission decides to issue an Interim Final Rule, that means that their regulations would take effect BEFORE anyone outside the commission has had an opportunity to review and comment on them.  This is not acceptable.  

Typically, administrative agencies issue a notice of proposed rulemaking and give stakeholders an opportunity to comment on proposed regulations before they take effect.  We believe that it is essential that the disability community and broader civil rights coalition that worked hard to get the ADA Amendments Act signed into law have an opportunity to see and comment on the new regulations before they take effect, and we are concerned that the Commission would try to rush through a final rule with no public comment at the end of an administration.    

Call today to let the EEOC Chairperson, Naomi Churchill Earp, and the Legal Counsel, Reed Russell, know that we want an opportunity to review the proposed regulations BEFORE they take effect.  The ADA Amendments Act was the product of long negotiations and discussions with multiple stakeholders, and it is important that the regulations benefit from the same kind of broad-based input.  The new law repudiates an overly narrow approach to the definition of disability that had been applied by the U.S. Supreme Court AND the EEOC, and we don’t want to see the new regulations inadvertently create new problems for charging parties with disabilities and employers.  

Congress did not instruct EEOC to issue regulations before the new law’s effective date, and there is no reason for the regulatory process to move forward without the typical notice and opportunity to comment.   Our message to EEOC is simple:  Don’t issue a rule before we have an opportunity to be heard. 

Nothing about us without us.

To reach the Chair’s office, call 202 663-4002.

To reach the Legal Counsel, call 202 663-4609.

How to Join the PAIMI Council of the Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy

 
Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy

Virginia’s Protection and Advocacy System Serving Persons with Disabilities

Home     News     Staff     VOPA Board     Advisory Councils     Programs/Goals     Links    Speakers Bureau
Publications     Housing Resource Center     Performance Reports     Investigations     Site Map     Search     
Translations

PROTECTION AND ADVOCACY FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH
 MENTAL ILLNESS ADVISORY COUNCIL
(PAIMI)

bullet

Meetings

 

Upcoming meeting dates include:  To be announced.

bullet

Meeting Minutes (Click on this link to take you to Meeting Minutes.)

 

 

 

bullet

Council Mission

The PAIMI Advisory Council’s mission is to provide recommendations to the Governing Board of the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy (VOPA) on policies and goals to be implemented to assure that individuals, covered by the PAIMI Act, are free from abuse, neglect, and related rights violations.

 

 

 

bullet

Council Membership

The PAIMI Advisory Council is comprised of 15-20 members and shall be broadly representative of the diverse culture and geography of Virginia.  The membership of Council shall include individuals who have received or are receiving mental health services and family members, attorneys, mental health professionals, individuals knowledgeable about mental illness, and providers of mental health services.  At least sixty percent of the membership is composed of individuals who have received or are receiving mental health services or who are family members of such individuals.  The Council includes at least one member who is the parent of a minor child with mental illness.

If you are interested in joining Council, please complete the Council Application (Word/PDF) and return the form to VOPA.  If you have questions about the Council, please contact VOPA at 804-225-2042 or 1-800-552-3962 or e-mail to general.vopa@vopa.virginia.gov.

 

Locked Wards Harm Psychiatric Patients British Study Finds: Does the U.S Have ANY Unlocked Wards Anymore?

Locked Wards ‘Harm Patients’

by Denis Campbell Guardian November 30 2008

The locking of mental health patients into their wards in NHS hospitals makes them more likely to be violent, harm themselves and refuse medication, new research shows.

Treating people with depression, schizophrenia or manic moods as if they were prisoners is designed to promote safety, but increases the risk of them attacking nurses or fellow patients, according to the study by London’s City University.

‘A locked-doors approach is more likely to leave the patient seeing the ward as a prison, themselves as prisoners and the staff as jailers,’ said Professor Len Bowers, who led the research. He found half of all hospital wards which look after those being treated under the Mental Health Act use a ‘locked doors’ approach.

But Bowers and his team found that it leads to patients feeling frustrated, stigmatized and depressed, and that can result in them being unruly. The policy increases the risk of physical aggression to others by 11 per cent, self-harm (20 per cent) and refusal of medication (22 per cent). The study found that while patients held this way are 25 per cent less likely to escape and commit suicide outside, those who cannot go out are more likely to feel worthless and suicidal.

Strict security does not reduce the 150-strong toll of such patients who take their own life each year, said Bowers. He argued that wards should be unlocked, with staff placed at the entrance to check who enters and leaves. There are about 10,000 people in the UK on acute psychiatric wards.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/nov/30/mental-health-nhs-locked-wards

“All Our Lives We Must Struggle to Rid the Earth of All Such Crimes”

Two Good Arms by Charlie Parker sung by Holly Near

We All Matter

I Aspire To Be Just Like My Father :)

“In the early 1970s, John Szwed, Erving Goffman, and Hymes founded the Center for Urban Ethnography at the University of Pennsylvania. Szwed recalls that Goffman, a renowned sociologist, was famously critical and acerbic in his judgments, but Hymes was never the victim of his coruscating tongue. One day, Szwed asked Goffman why. Goffman’s reply: “That’s because he’s a principled man and principled people are dangerous.”‘

Cesar Chumil’s Company in the Activity Room Looks Really Friendly Doesn’t It?

"WSH staff" in helmets and protective gear in activity room

Virginia Alliance For Community Calls on Governor Kaine to Step Into the 20th Century Like 49 Other States

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 18, 2008

Contact: Jamie Trosclair

(804) 649-8481, ext. 101

jtrosclair@arcofva.org

VIRGINIA ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY

Virginia must reform Central Virginia Training Center.

People with intellectual disabilities want community-based services,

not institutions.

Today, the Virginia Board for People with Disabilities, the Partnership for People

with Disabilities, the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy, The Arc of

Virginia and Virginia’s 22 local chapters of The Arc announced a collaborative effort

to launch the Virginia Alliance for Community. The

 

 

Virginia Alliance for

Community

 

 

provides a unified and collective voice in advocating for the civil rights

for Virginians with intellectual and developmental disabilities, especially concerning

the need to move away from its historical bias and antiquated practice of

institutionalizing people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

As its first course of action, the Virginia Alliance for Community calls on Governor

Kaine to reform Central Virginia Training Center, one of the oldest and largest

institutions in the country. Virginia’s 2009 State Budget earmarked $43 million for

the rebuilding and renovation of Central Virginia Training Center. The Virginia

Alliance for Community proposes that these capital outlay funds instead be used to

create community-based housing for the men and women currently living in Central

Virginia Training Center. This action by the Governor would be a bold and longoverdue

step toward the transformation of Virginia’s support system from an

institutional to a community-based model.

“People with intellectual and developmental disabilities have a right to live in the

community and the state has a right and responsibility to commit to a true

community-based system of support,” said Howard Cullum, President of The Arc of

Virginia. “The time to act is now.”

“This proposal is about more than bricks and mortar,” said Colleen Miller, Executive

Director of the Virginia Office for Protection and Advocacy. “For people with

intellectual and developmental disabilities, it is about civil rights.”

 

Virginia Alliance for Community November 18, 2008

Proposed Training Center Initiative Announcement Page 2 of 2

People First of Northern Virginia, a self-advocacy group comprised of people with intellectual

and developmental disabilities, echoed the concerns raised by the newly formed Virginia

Alliance for Community, issuing the following statement of support: “It is about time for

Virginia to invest in community over institutions. No one else around the country is investing in

institutions. People with disabilities do not want to live in 300-bed facilities. We want “A Life

Like Yours!”

Bobby, a member of the group and former resident of CVTC, shared, “I lived in a training center

for years and I didn’t like it. I love my life now, living in my own home, going to Redskin Games

and deciding when to get my hair cut (by the way it is a little longer now).”

Details of the Virginia Alliance for Community’s proposal can be found at www.arcofva.org.

The Virginia Alliance for Community encourages all organizations supporting community-based

services for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to join the newly formed

coalition’s efforts. For more information on how to get involved, contact Jamie Trosclair,

Executive Director of The Arc of Virginia, at jtrosclair@arcofva.org or 804-649-8481, ext. 101.

 

Grafton School Wrongful Death Lawsuit May Go Forward Virginia Supreme Court Orders

http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2008/12/05/supreme-court-decides-gross-negligence-case-by-order/

“Six employees of the school, which serves youth and adults with severe behavioral disorders, restrained an autistic, mentally retarded 13-year-old, who became violent in December 2004. The youth died from injuries sustained in the incident.”

Male Patient with Criminal History Rapes Female Patient In Bedroom ACROSS From His

http://www. tampabay.com/news/health/article928112.ece

Still no need for giving patients the option of single gender units Virginia?  You are building a new Western State Hospital, unfortunately, and you are not taking advantage of this opportunity to create a building that allows female and male patients to make the choice to live on single gender units.  Not units with a day room in the middle, but truly single gender units/wards is what is needed to keep (mostly) female patients safe.  Also in need of change is Virginia’s system of release of NGRI and lacking capacity forensic patients who in the present system can not be released unless they move up to units where they are mixed with civilly committed patients who have no criminal history.  You can say all you like that those who are convicted are no different than those who are not but I am not buying it, that is just stigmatizing all psychiatric patients and comes from working too long with forensic patients and with released convicts.  We need separate forensic units and we need to make it possible for NGRI folks (until we get rid of this out of date and harmful plea option which leads to more time locked up than simply pleading guilty or being convicted) to be released without putting other patients in danger of being raped in a hospital.

Cesar Chumil Not Moved From Western State, Not Given Spanish Language Treatment, Not Treated Like Human but Technically, Using a Loophole, Not in Seclusion Since Monday

http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20081205/NEWS01/81205042/1002

The State Human Rights Committee Friday, December 5th, 2008, approved Western State Hospital’s Director Jack Barber’s plan to allow Cesar Chumil to leave his suite but not to interact with his fellow patients even though it has been years since he interacted let alone attacked a fellow patient.  They also are saying he has staff with him but the staff are in protective gear and helmets, so that’s a little like saying having the riot squad or the SWAT team in a large room with you is being “with” “treatment” staff.  Staff who do not speak Spanish which is the language Cesar speaks, so technically Cesar is no longer in seclusion as of this past Monday but in reality, he still has no one to talk to in his language, no active treatment and no chance of regaining lost social skills or overcoming fears of interaction.  In other words, Western State Hospital proposed and the State Human Rights Committee approved, a plan that will do nothing to prepare Cesar Chumil for more freedom or more interaction and certainly not for the claimed plan to discharge him to a community treatment center.  It’s like buying your dog a really big crate and hiring men in protective gear to stand around but never play with your dog and pretending you are taking good care of your dog.  Or raising your child in a really big Skinner’s box.  Choose your own metaphor but this is not what the SHRC originally asked for and is based on fear and suspicion and prejudice towards Cesar Chumil rather than true treatment planning geared towards his unique needs, needs created by Western State Hospital and other state hospitals in the first place.  It almost seems as if Virginia’s DMHMRSAS itself is a fear-based organization.  Fear of litigation, fear of doing something different, fear of criticism, fear of new ideas, fear of change.

How Minnesota Is Observing International Human Rights Day-By Forcing ECT on Ray Sandford Who Lives in the Community

 Ray’s Next Scheduled Involuntary Outpatient Electroshock is:
     10 December — International Human Rights Day!

by David W. Oaks, Executive Director, MindFreedom International

This Wednesday, 10 December 2008, human rights activists all over the
world will be celebrating the 60th anniversary of the signing of the
United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

10 December is the UN’s official International Human Rights Day.

10 December is also the day that Ray Sandford is scheduled to receive
his 35th involuntary outpatient electroshock.

NEW ON WEB: Learn Ray’s story — Frequently Asked Questions About Ray
Sandford Campaign, click here:
http://www.mindfreedom.org/shield/ray/sandford-faq

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     Latest News on Ray Campaign

Unless action is taken swiftly, then this Wednesday morning, as he
has been for most mornings in the last few months, Ray will be
awakened early by staff in his room at the group residence Victory
House near Minneapolis.

Once more an escort will bring him against his will the 15 miles to
Mercy Hospital, where once more — under court order — doctors will
place electrodes on his head for another electroconvulsive therapy
(ECT), or electroshock, that can and has wiped out precious memories
and cognitive abilities from Ray.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     The Good News About Ray Campaign:

Because of MindFreedom’s campaign to support Ray Sandford:

* The Minnesota Governor’s office reports receiving “hundreds” of
complaints. Thank you everyone!

* Three agencies are now working to replace Ray’s non-responsive
court-appointed attorney with a new attorney.

* National media has finally interviewed Ray for an upcoming broadcast.

     The Bad News: It is Not Enough! Speak Out Now!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

      ** ACTION ** ACTION ** ACTION **

It is time to take the Ray Campaign up a notch, peacefully but strongly!

Let this become a top issue in the Governor’s office.

Telephone Governor Pawlenty’s office *NOW*:

Call any day, but especially call *before* Ray’s scheduled
electroshock next Wednesday, 10 December 2008.

Call from anywhere in the world phone (651) 296-3391.

  From inside Minnesota phone toll free (800) 657-3717.

You have the best chance of reaching staff from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
Central Time weekdays.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     WHY WON’T GOVERNOR PAWLENTY REPLY? Find out! Ask!

Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty has completely stone-walled!

* His office refuses to issue any statement on the policy of forced
electroshock.

* He claims he can do nothing, that the courts are in charge, when he
could at least make sure Ray gets better legal representation for a
stay or appeal.

* His office operators have been instructed to immediately redirect
calls about Ray into a voice mail. No one we know of has ever heard
back. Some operators have hung up on callers.

* Meanwhile, the Governor is sponsoring a $200-a-head luxury hotel
conference about International Human Rights Day!

     It is time to get creative!

* Ray will not give up!

* We will not give up!

* Don’t you give up!

     Please be peaceful, but be CREATIVELY MALADJUSTED in your next
phone calls to Governor Pawlenty’s office.

First, get the name of the operator and write it down. Then start by
asking polite but firm questions about advocacy…

* about citizen input…

* about who to talk to about mental health policy…

* about the names and phone numbers of the Ombudsman office

* about mental health policy and the mental health division…

* about how poor people can have adequate legal representation…

And only then ask about why the Governor is refusing to speak out
about Involuntary Outpatient Electroshock (IOE)?

Insist on speaking to a live real person about this issue.

If you do not get a real person with a real reply, CALL BACK.

If an operator hangs up on you, call back and ask to speak to a
manager and complain.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

REMEMBER:

Telephone Governor Pawlenty’s office *NOW*:

Call any day, but especially call *before* Ray’s scheduled
electroshock next Wednesday, 10 December 2008.

Call from anywhere in the world phone (651) 296-3391.

  From inside Minnesota phone toll free (800) 657-3717.

You have the best chance of reaching staff from 8:00 am to 4:30 pm
Central Time weekdays.

If you do receive any helpful information or leads, e-mail it to news-
at-mindfreedom.org.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     Learn more about Ray on the all-new “Frequently Asked Questions”
page about the Ray Campaign.

Learn about:

* The back story about Ray.

* How MindFreedom filed an official torture complaint about the State
of Minnesota to the United Nations.

* And what else you can do to help.

Click on the Frequently Asked Questions page here:
http://www.mindfreedom.org/shield/ray/sandford-faq

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A clickable version of above Ray Alert 5 is on web here:
http://www.mindfreedom.org/shield/ray/alert-5-sandford

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

     Get Around the Media Blackout! Forward this human rights alert to
all people who care about human rights, on and off the Internet!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Encourage Everyone to Join MindFreedom International During the Fall
2008 Support Drive

Build the people power it will take to stop the kind of torture that
Ray is experiencing!

For information about how you can join MindFreedom today, click here:

http://www.mindfreedom.org/join-donate

RIP Odetta

 Odetta, the folk singer with the powerful voice who moved audiences and influenced fellow musicians for a half-century, died Tuesday Dec. 2, 2008. She was 77. 
Odetta’s monumental voice rang out in August 1963 when she sang “I’m on My Way” at the historic March on Washington, where Martin Luther King gave his “I Have a Dream” speech.
She had hoped to perform again in Washington next month when Barack Obama is inaugurated as the nation’s first black president. But the acclaimed folk singer, who influenced generations of musicians and was an icon in the civil rights struggle, died Tuesday after battling heart disease. She was 77.
In spite of failing health, Odetta performed 60 concerts in the last two years, and her singing ability never diminished, manager Doug Yeager said.

Associated Press © 2008
Odetta singing “Something Inside So Strong” while using a wheelchair in youtube below:

Blacks Disproportionately Involuntarily Committed in the United Kingdom, Also UK Campaigners Fight for Single Gender Wards, Why Not U.S. Advocates?

http://psychminded.co.uk/news/news2008/nov08/mental_health_race_row007.htm

“THE row over the vastly disproportionate rate that black people are detained in psychiatric units intensified yesterday after the release of figures indicating no improvement since the government vowed to tackle the problem three years ago.”

“Campaigners were also furious that the commission’s Count Me In census found 68% of psychiatric inpatients not being on single-sex wards. They are particularly concerned about vulnerable female patients sharing wards with male patients”

Virginia is unfortunately building a new Western State Hospital for millions and millions of dollars but there is no talk at all of providing the option of single gender units to women and men who would prefer them.  And it isn’t even up for discussion.  Why not?

Thanksgiving Greetings to the 2 Million American Citizens in U.S. Prisons and to Everyone In Psychiatric Prison/Hospital on Thanksgiving Day

Inspiration in the Face of Setbacks–We Can Keep This up to Our Late 80’s Too!

Western State Local Human Rights Committee Minutes in Which They Deprive Cesar Chumil of His Human Rights, Again

DRAFT

Western State Hospital

Staunton, Virginia

Local Human Rights Committee Meeting Minutes

Jeffreys Building, Room 95 at 12:30

 

 

 

 

 

November 12, 2008

Present:

 

 

 

 

 

David Reed, Linda Thumma, Ski Washington, Donna Gum, Hal Meyers, Committee

Members; Jerry Thomas, Advocate; Chuck Collins, Regional Advocate; Gail Burford,

Director’s Liaison

 

 

 

Guests:

 

 

 

 

 

Dr. Jack Barber, Director; Karen Walters, Office of Attorney General on behalf of

WSH; Nathan Veldhuis, attorney on behalf of Mr. C.C. and family; Kimberly Crett,

Court Reporter, Cavalier Reporting and Videography,

 

 

 

Absent

 

 

 

 

 

: Debbie Harris, Committee Member

David Reed, Chair, called the meeting of the Local Human Rights Committee to order on November 12, 2008.

A quorum of members was present. .

Jerry Thomas reviewed with the committee the Human Rights Regulation

 

 

 

 

 

12 VAC 35-115.220

 

on Variances.

Mr. Reed announced the request for a Variance to

 

 

 

 

 

12 VAC 35-115-110 (Use of seclusion, restraint, and time

out)

 

 

 

 

 

of the

Rules and Regulations to Assure the Rights of Individuals Receiving Services from Providers

Licensed, Funded or Operated by the Department of Mental Health, Mental Retardation and Substance Abuse

Services

 

 

 

 

 

presented by Dr. Jack Barber in regards to patient CC.

Nathan Veldhuis objected to the Local Human Rights Committee going into “closed session”.

The committee made a vote to have the court reporter excluded from the “closed session”.

Mr. Veldhuis also objected to this decision.

 

 

 

Upon a motion made by Hal Meyers and seconded by Donna Gum, the Local Human Rights Committee

convened in Closed Session pursuant to Virginia Code, 2.2-3711(15), for the purpose of discussion or

consideration of medical and mental records excluded from the Virginia Freedom of Information Act.

Upon reconvening in public session, each member of the committee certified that to the best of each one’s

knowledge, only public business matters lawfully exempt from statutory open meeting requirements, and only

public business matters identified in the motion to convene the Closed Session were discussed in the Closed

Session.

The specific regulations to which WSH requested variances along with the LHRC’s decisions are as follows:

12 VAC 35-115.110.C.3: